Satellite image: NASA EOSDIS GIBS, VIIRS true colour, a cloud-free median of daily images from August and September 2025. Geology of Uzbekistan: Map of Mineral Deposits of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 1:500,000 (2020; chief editor B.F. Islamov), traced for this map; beyond Uzbekistan: Persits, Ulmishek & Steinshouer (1998), USGS, after the Geologic Map of the USSR at 1:7,500,000 (1966). Thermal waters: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, traced for this map. Heat flow: measurements from Global Heat Flow Database, Release 2024 (IHFC) (CC BY 4.0) and values from Sidorova et al. (2023), Aitmetova & Meylieva (2021), Bakiev et al. (2022), Mukhammadiev (2025), Sanders et al. (1995), Shoimurotov et al. (2023), Shoymuratov (2020), Tulyaganov (2011), interpolated for this map; the map of Zui, Andreyev & Rakhmatullayev (2020), Fig. 4 (CC BY-NC 4.0), and its faults, redrawn for this map. Isotopes in precipitation: OIPC gridded maps (Bowen and Revenaugh, 2003; Bowen et al., 2005; data IAEA/WMO GNIP), brought to the height of the ground with the Copernicus DEM and adjusted to the measured means of studies in the Research section. Rock sequences: Geolex (Geologic TimeScale Foundation; Abduazimova, 2001). Borders, regions, rivers and lakes: Natural Earth. Earthquakes: U.S. Geological Survey, ANSS Comprehensive Earthquake Catalog (ComCat) (public domain). Seismic hazard: GEM Global Seismic Hazard Map, version 2023.1 (Johnson et al., 2023) (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Precipitation and air temperature: CHELSA v2.1 (Karger et al., 2017) (CC0). Water isotopes: Isabekov et al. (2026); Isabekov (2026); Nishonov et al. (2024); Saidaliyeva et al. (2024); Umirzakov et al. (2023); Yapiyev et al. (2024); position of the Barkrak glacier: © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL). Winter surface temperature: Landsat 8–9 Collection 2 surface temperature, courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey. Relief: Copernicus DEM GLO-30 (© DLR e.V. 2010–2014 and © Airbus Defence and Space GmbH 2014–2018, provided under COPERNICUS by the European Union and ESA). Land cover: ESA WorldCover 10 m 2021 v200 (© ESA WorldCover project 2021, contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data (2021) processed by ESA WorldCover consortium; CC BY 4.0). Population: GHS-POP R2023A (Schiavina et al., 2023, European Commission, Joint Research Centre; CC BY 4.0). CO₂ emissions: EDGAR 2025 (European Commission, Joint Research Centre, with IEA data; CC BY 4.0).
Heat flow. Mapped heat flow over most of Uzbekistan is about 60–75 mW/m². It is lower around Tashkent and rises above 80 mW/m² in parts of the Fergana Valley and in Surkhandarya near Termez. Source: Zui, Andreyev & Rakhmatullayev (2020). Heat flow of Uzbekistan: geology and interpretation. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Geography and Geology, 1, 95–105. Pins are placed from published coordinates; location precision is graded A (published GPS position), B (facility pin on an online map) or C (approximate).
All 46 thermal water sites as a table
| No. | Site | Region | Temperature | Depth | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tashkent city | 44–47 °C (bath and drinking water); 51 °C (operator site) | 1,530–1,600 m | B | |
| 2 | Tashkent city | 22–40 °C | 1,544 m | B | |
| 3 | Tashkent city | 48 °C (bath); 35 °C (drinking) | 1,820 m | B | |
| 4 | Tashkent region | 57 °C at discovery (1952); 37–40 °C today | 1,371 m | C | |
| 5 | Tashkent region | 49–52 °C | 1,300 m | C | |
| 6 | Tashkent region | 74–78 °C | 1,780 m | B | |
| 7 | Tashkent region | 35–55 °C | 1,960 m | A | |
| 8 | Tashkent region | 40–45 °C | 1,820 m | B | |
| 9 | Tashkent region | about 48 °C at the wellhead | 1,400 m | B | |
| 10 | Tashkent region | 36–36.7 °C, constant year-round | Spring | C | |
| 11 | Syrdarya region | 31 °C | 1,620 m | B | |
| 12 | Fergana region | 37–42 °C; 41 °C from the 1,756 m well | 1,756 m | B | |
| 13 | Fergana region | 23–25 °C (bath); 20 °C (drinking, 1,650 m) | 506 and 669 m | B | |
| 14 | Fergana region | 36 °C | – | C | |
| 15 | Namangan region | 42–47 °C (wells 2 and 5); 44 °C (bath); 40–60 °C (well 1); up to 72 °C | 1,229–1,624 m | A | |
| 16 | Namangan region | 24–32 °C | 507 m | A | |
| 17 | Namangan region | 50 °C | 1,300 m | C | |
| 18 | Namangan region | 23 °C | 450 m | C | |
| 19 | Namangan region | 22–27 °C | Spring | C | |
| 20 | Andijan region | 18–40 °C | – | C | |
| 21 | Samarkand region | 37–43 °C | 650 m | A | |
| 22 | Navoi region | 64–70 °C | 135–300 m | C | |
| 23 | Bukhara region | 40–42 °C (bath); 50–52 °C (drinking) | 40 m (bath); 1,100 m (drinking) | A | |
| 24 | Kashkadarya region | 37–38 °C (bath) | 1,350 m | C | |
| 25 | Surkhandarya region | 30–40 °C (H₂S water); 37–38 °C (iodine–bromine water) | 234 m; 390–432 m | C | |
| 26 | Surkhandarya region | 40 °C | 1,050.5 m | C | |
| 27 | Surkhandarya region | 76 °C (1979); 72 °C (2016) at the wellhead | – | C | |
| 28 | Surkhandarya region | 39–40 °C | – | C | |
| 29 | Surkhandarya region | 25 °C | – | C | |
| 30 | Surkhandarya region | 30–31 °C | Spring | C | |
| 31 | Khorezm region | 22 °C | 700 m | C | |
| 32 | Navoi region | up to 46 °C | – | C | |
| 33 | Navoi region | 42–53 °C (mine water and rock); thermal water up to 56 °C | Ore down to 500 m; the main thermal aquifer lies below 411 m in the Kyzylkumsky shaft | C | |
| 34 | Tashkent city | 47–47.5 °C | 2,058 m, filters at 1,687–1,776 m (well 1); 1,902 m (well 2) | B | |
| 35 | Tashkent city | 62 °C | 2,435 m | C | |
| 36 | Tashkent city | 22–24 °C | 2,375 m | B | |
| 37 | Tashkent region | 58 °C | 1,900 m | B | |
| 38 | Tashkent region | 55 °C at the outflow | – | C | |
| 39 | Tashkent region | 55 °C at the outflow | – | C | |
| 40 | Samarkand region | 45 °C | 600 m | C | |
| 41 | Samarkand region | 36 °C (three wells); 37–40 °C (well No. 9) | 300 m (three wells) | C | |
| 42 | Bukhara region | 92 °C at the outflow | 2,950 m | C | |
| 43 | Surkhandarya region | 37–40 °C | – | B | |
| 44 | Surkhandarya region | 40 °C | – | B | |
| 45 | Surkhandarya region | 21–24 °C | – | C | |
| 46 | Republic of Karakalpakstan | 38–41 °C | Top of the aquifer at 380–520 m | C |
40 prospective geothermal water fields, by region
| Region | Field or site | Water temperature, °C | Mineralisation, g/l |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andijan region | South Alamishik | 45 | 14 |
| Sufikishlok | 42 | 1.5–3 | |
| Khojaabad | 40 | 4 | |
| Marhamat | 33 | 118–133 | |
| Palvantash | 31–32 | 239.8 | |
| Bukhara region | Umid | 92 | 90–130 |
| Jurun-Bolo | 53–63 | 1.6 | |
| Juizar | 53–54 | 1.3 | |
| Sitorai-Mohi-Hosa | 46–47 | 3.2–3.4 | |
| Bukhara | 46 | 2.8 | |
| Karakul site | 20–24 | 10.99–13.6 | |
| Jizzakh region | Gallaaral | 20–22 | 2.85 |
| Kashkadarya region | Shahrisabz | 80 | 2.4 |
| Agron | 70 | 0.9 | |
| Uirot | 60–65 | 1.14 | |
| Maido-yobi | 60 | 0.85 | |
| Karabair | 60 | 1.3 | |
| Karkuk | 60 | 1.6 | |
| Dultali | 50 | 1 | |
| Turon water | 42 | 0.47 | |
| Kashkadaryo Sohili | 38 | 2.8 | |
| Kamashi | 18–20 | 1.3–1.44 | |
| Namangan region | Gurtepa | 81 | 60 |
| Hotamtoe | 25–51 | 10–54.2 | |
| Samarkand region | Humor | 40 | 3.2 |
| Syrdarya region | Hawatag | 60–62 | 4.2 |
| Tashkent region | Bekabad | 51 | 4.6–4.8 |
| Chirchik | 22 | 5.2 | |
| Aktepe | 20 | 9.65 | |
| Aktash | – | 3 | |
| Fergana region | Tashlak | 25 | 0.5–0.65 |
| Toshkentlik-guzar | 23–24 | 0.26 | |
| Khorezm region | Koshkupyr | 46 | 46.3 |
| Republic of Karakalpakstan | Tumarastau | 27–41 | 1.45–25 |
| Nurbay | 36–40 | 5–11.6 | |
| Baimurat | 28–38 | 2.3–3 | |
| Kempirtobe | 28–38 | 1.8–3 | |
| Nsan | 28–37 | 1.55–2.3 | |
| Chukurkak | 28 | – | |
| Tahiatash | 25–28 | 37–81.1 |
Source: Ibragimov, Ismailov, Mumindjanov, Tursunmetov & Gafurov (2025). Thermal energy resources of geothermal waters of Uzbekistan and prospects of their utilization. AIP Conference Proceedings 3256, 040035. These fields have no published coordinates, so they are listed rather than mapped.
Talks and institutions
Tashkent
Where the IGA met Uzbekneftegaz and the Ministry of Mining Industry and Geology in September 2025. Home to the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, the Institute HYDROENGEO and the University of Geological Sciences, which BRGM experts have visited several times since 2025.
Research site
Muruntau, Navoi region
A 3D model of the deep structure, built from gravity, seismic and magnetotelluric surveys, with well sites chosen for a planned geothermal station to serve a new settlement for the gold quarry.
Resource area
Bukhara–Karshi artesian basin
Two aquifer complexes with estimated thermal resources of about 555,000 Gcal a year, from a 1977–79 assessment. Some of the warmest geothermal water in the country is found in the Bukhara region. A well at Umid gave 92 °C water from Upper Jurassic beds at 2,950 m.
Read the storySource: YuzNews, 2021
Research site
Gulistan area, Gissar region
Two high heat-flow anomalies and possible reservoirs at 2.5–3.5 km. Researchers propose a 100 MW binary-cycle plant here, built in 50 MW stages.
Project
Urganch district, Khorezm
Family polyclinic No. 27 heats with a geothermal heat pump, saving about 10,000 m³ of gas a year.
Project
Kokand, Fergana region
Home of Uzbekgeofizika’s Fergana Geophysical Expedition. Feasibility work on a geothermal pilot at deep well No. 1 began here in 2025, and in September 2026 the expedition hosted BRGM and University of Geological Sciences geologists studying the valley’s geothermal potential.
Resource area
South Aral area
Hydrothermal aquifers in Cretaceous rocks of the Aral Sea basin, and hot dry rock resources cited at 4–6 km. On the dried south-eastern bed of the sea, wells opened a Turonian–Senonian aquifer with self-flowing water at 38–41 °C.
Source: Wikipedia, YuzNews, 2021
Resource area
Fergana Valley
A Senonian aquifer in the Mingbulak basin, Namangan region, and the Chust–Adrasman anomaly, cited for hot dry rock at 4–6 km.
Source: Wikipedia, YuzNews, 2021
Water study
Sokh alluvial fan, Fergana region
Mean depth to groundwater in four observation wells on the fan: about 1.7–2.6 m in two, about 49 m and 94–97 m in the others. Between 1961–1990 and 1991–2020 the water table rose in all four, by 0.13–2.55 m; the author relates the rise to warming, more precipitation and higher flow of the Sokh River.
Water study
Middle Zarafshan oases, Samarkand region
Under irrigated land the water table lies on average 4–8 m deep in the Samarkand oasis and 3–7 m deep in Narpay and Pakhtachi districts; in Narpay, Kattakurgan and Ishtikhon districts it is within 3 m of the surface on 41–47% of irrigated land. Irrigation has raised the water table and its mineralisation, more so towards the west: mineralisation is under 1 g/L in the eastern districts, 1–3 g/L in the central ones and 3–5 g/L on small areas in the west.
Water study
Kashkadarya River basin
In September 2025 Uzhydromet’s Hydrometeorological Research Institute and the U.S. Geological Survey began a one-year study that uses stable isotopes of oxygen and hydrogen to trace where the river’s water comes from through the seasons. River samples are to be taken each season at several places.
Project
Nurabad, Samarkand region
Since 2008 the town’s hot water has come from geothermal well No. 9, about 5 km from the boiler house, put into service in 1980 for drinking water. The water arrives at 37–40 °C. In summer it goes straight into the hot-water network; in winter the boiler house heats it further for heating and hot water. The Navoi Mining and Metallurgical Combinat puts the saving at up to 1,000 t of standard fuel a year. In the same district, the Abu Ali ibn Sino sanatorium uses radon water at 37–43 °C. A 180 m well in the uranium ore field of Nurabad that supplies water to the town’s heating systems carries radon, which leaves the water within hours of contact with air.
Water study
Former Yangiabad uranium mine, Tashkent region
At the former uranium mine of Yangiabad, at about 1,300 m in the mountains of Tashkent region, mine water has a gross alpha activity of 5.17–6.02 Bq/L and a gross beta activity of 2.05–2.29 Bq/L, above Uzbekistan's radiation safety norms of 0.2 and 2.0 Bq/L; surface water stays within them. The gamma dose rate 10 cm above the water is 0.55–1.22 µSv/h.
Thermal water site, Tashkent city
Chinobod sanatorium
- Type
- Sanatorium, own thermal wells
- Temperature
- 44–47 °C (bath and drinking water); 51 °C (operator site)
- Depth
- 1,530–1,600 m
- Water and use
- Alkaline Cl–HCO₃–Na water of the Tashkent artesian basin; in use since 1946.
- District
- Yunusobod
- Location
- B: facility pin on an online map
Sources: Sihatgoh (Federation of Trade Unions sanatoria network): Chinobod sanatorium; Chinabad sanatorium: About; Yandex Maps organisation pages (facility map pins used for precision-B coordinates); Aitmetova & Meylieva (2021)
Thermal water site, Tashkent city
Chinobod Plaza
- Type
- Sanatorium well
- Temperature
- 22–40 °C
- Depth
- 1,544 m
- Water and use
- Low-mineralised Cl–SO₄–HCO₃–Na water.
- District
- Yunusobod
- Location
- B: facility pin on an online map
Sources: Yandex Maps organisation pages (facility map pins used for precision-B coordinates); Sihatgoh: Chinobod Plaza
Thermal water site, Tashkent city
Turon sanatorium
- Type
- Sanatorium well
- Temperature
- 48 °C (bath); 35 °C (drinking)
- Depth
- 1,820 m
- Water and use
- Cl–SO₄–HCO₃–Na water.
- District
- Mirzo Ulug‘bek
- Location
- B: facility pin on an online map
Sources: Yandex Maps organisation pages (facility map pins used for precision-B coordinates); Sihatgoh: Turon sanatorium; Aitmetova & Meylieva (2021)
Thermal water site, Tashkent region
Tashkent Mineral Waters, wells 5/1 and 6/2
- Type
- Thermal wells, sanatorium, bottling
- Temperature
- 57 °C at discovery (1952); 37–40 °C today
- Depth
- 1,371 m
- Water and use
- SO₄–HCO₃–Na, 0.5–1.5 g/l, pH ≥ 8, SiO₂ ≥ 50 mg/l. Drilled during oil and gas exploration; bottled as “1371”.
- District
- Tashkent district (Ko‘ksaroy, near Keles, about 20 km north of the city)
- Location
- C: approximate (settlement or district)
Sources: Tashkent Mineral Waters (Toshmineralsuv): company site; Repost.uz: Tashkent water returns (2025); Spot.uz: Toshmineralsuv bottler (28 Mar 2025); Aitmetova & Meylieva (2021)
Tashthermal sanatorium
- Type
- Sanatorium well
- Temperature
- 49–52 °C
- Depth
- 1,300 m
- Water and use
- Na–Cl–HCO₃ siliceous water.
- District
- Tashkent district (same site as wells 5/1 and 6/2)
- Location
- C: approximate (settlement or district)
Sources: Tashthermal sanatorium: official site
Thermal water site, Tashkent region
Balneology Research Centre (Nazarbek sanatorium)
- Type
- Sanatorium well
- Temperature
- 74–78 °C
- Depth
- 1,780 m
- Water and use
- Alkaline Cl–HCO₃–Na water.
- District
- Zangiota
- Location
- B: facility pin on an online map
Sources: Yandex Maps organisation pages (facility map pins used for precision-B coordinates); Sihatgoh: Balneology (Kurortology) Research Centre, Tarnov, Zangiota; Aitmetova & Meylieva (2021)
Thermal water site, Tashkent region
Zangiota Zam-Zam sanatorium (well 7-PR)
- Type
- Sanatorium well
- Temperature
- 35–55 °C
- Depth
- 1,960 m
- Water and use
- Drilled in 1990. 3.5–5.2 g/l Cl–Na–SO₄, pH 8.1; Br 40.4, H₂SiO₃ 44.4, I 1.0 mg/l.
- District
- Zangiota (O‘rtaovul)
- Location
- A: published GPS position
Sources: ThermalSprings.ru: Zangiota Zam-Zam sanatorium; Zangiota Zam-Zam sanatorium: official site; Aitmetova & Meylieva (2021); Ismailov et al. (2024)
Thermal water site, Tashkent region
Botanika sanatorium
- Type
- Sanatorium well
- Temperature
- 40–45 °C
- Depth
- 1,820 m
- Water and use
- Cl–SO₄–Ca/Na–Mg water; 15 km from Chirchiq.
- District
- Qibray
- Location
- B: facility pin on an online map
Sources: Yandex Maps organisation pages (facility map pins used for precision-B coordinates); Sihatgoh: Botanika sanatorium; Aitmetova & Meylieva (2021)
Thermal water site, Tashkent region
Chotqol sanatorium
- Type
- Sanatorium well
- Temperature
- about 48 °C at the wellhead
- Depth
- 1,400 m
- Water and use
- Nitrogen thermal water, about 1.1 g/l, HCO₃–Cl–SO₄ Mg–Na, pH 7.8.
- District
- Bo‘stonliq (Gazalkent)
- Location
- B: facility pin on an online map
Sources: Yandex Maps organisation pages (facility map pins used for precision-B coordinates); Chotqol sanatorium: About; Aitmetova & Meylieva (2021); Ismailov et al. (2024)
Thermal water site, Tashkent region
Arashan-Bobo warm radon spring (Arashan lakes)
- Type
- Natural spring
- Temperature
- 36–36.7 °C, constant year-round
- Depth
- Spring
- Water and use
- One of very few natural warm springs found.
- District
- Ohangaron (some sources: Pop, Namangan); Chatkal ridge, about 2,800–3,400 m above sea level
- Location
- C: approximate (settlement or district)
Sources: Daryo.uz (26 Apr 2022): Only 18 of 206 thermal and mineral water springs in Uzbekistan are used; Eurasia.travel: Arashan-Bobo spring; Uzbekistan.travel: Tourist routes of Akhangaran district
Thermal water site, Syrdarya region
Yangiyer sanatorium
- Type
- Sanatorium well
- Temperature
- 31 °C
- Depth
- 1,620 m
- Water and use
- Low-mineralised iodine–bromine water.
- District
- Yangiyer city
- Location
- B: facility pin on an online map
Sources: Yandex Maps organisation pages (facility map pins used for precision-B coordinates); Sihatgoh: Yangiyer sanatorium
Thermal water site, Fergana region
Oltiariq sanatorium, Qiziltepa
- Type
- Sanatorium, artesian thermal well
- Temperature
- 37–42 °C; 41 °C from the 1,756 m well
- Depth
- 1,756 m
- Water and use
- Weakly mineralised Cl–SO₄–HCO₃–Na; found in 1954. Artesian, about 20 t/h. Baths, hot-water supply, bottling.
- District
- Oltiariq (Qiziltepa settlement)
- Location
- B: facility pin on an online map
Sources: Yandex Maps organisation pages (facility map pins used for precision-B coordinates); Uzpedia: Oltiariq sanatoriysi; Ziyonet: lecture 'Suv va issiqlik bilan davolash. Kurortlar' (PDF); Samatova, Khamraev & Abdullaeva (2016). Molodoy uchyonyi 6(110): 175–177; Ismailov et al. (2024)
Thermal water site, Fergana region
Chimyon sanatorium
- Type
- Sanatorium wells (Chimyon oil-field area)
- Temperature
- 23–25 °C (bath); 20 °C (drinking, 1,650 m)
- Depth
- 506 and 669 m
- Water and use
- Sulphide (H₂S) water, 91–92 mg/l (another source: 300–500 mg/l).
- District
- Fergana district
- Location
- B: facility pin on an online map
Sources: Yandex Maps organisation pages (facility map pins used for precision-B coordinates); Sihatgoh: Chimyon sanatorium; Uzpedia: Chimyon; Juraev et al. (2014)
Thermal water site, Fergana region
Dang‘ara thermal pools
- Type
- Pools fed by a thermal well
- Temperature
- 36 °C
- Water and use
- 2.4 g/l, pH 8.35. The point is the district centre; the exact site is not published.
- District
- Dang‘ara (near the Syr Darya)
- Location
- C: approximate (settlement or district)
Sources: ThermalSprings.ru: trip report on thermal springs of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan & Uzbekistan (Oct 2025); GeoNames gazetteer
Thermal water site, Namangan region
Chortoq sanatorium, deep wells No. 1, 2 and 5
- Type
- Sanatorium wells (drilled for oil, 1946–47)
- Temperature
- 42–47 °C (wells 2 and 5); 44 °C (bath); 40–60 °C (well 1); up to 72 °C
- Depth
- 1,229–1,624 m
- Water and use
- Nitrogen Cl–Na(–Ca) brines, 28–60 g/l, I 19–48 mg/l.
- District
- Chortoq (Chortoqsoy valley)
- Location
- A: published GPS position
Sources: ThermalSprings.ru: Chartak, Uzbekistan; Sihatgoh: Chortoq sanatorium; Uzpedia: Chortoq mineral suvi; Great Soviet Encyclopedia: Chartak (via dic.academic.ru); Bakiev et al. (2022); Ismailov et al. (2024)
Chortoq well No. 32 (“Chortoq” bottled water)
- Type
- Self-flowing thermal well
- Temperature
- 24–32 °C
- Depth
- 507 m
- Water and use
- SO₄–Cl–Na, 2.6–3.0 g/l; self-flowing 7–20 l/s.
- District
- Chortoq
- Location
- A: published GPS position
Sources: ThermalSprings.ru: Chartak, Uzbekistan; Sihatgoh: Chortoq sanatorium; Uzpedia: Chortoq mineral suvi; Chortoq water distributor: product page
Thermal water site, Namangan region
Chust–Pop thermal groundwater
- Type
- Thermal wells
- Temperature
- 50 °C
- Depth
- 1,300 m
- Water and use
- Iodine–bromine water.
- District
- Chust and Pop
- Location
- C: approximate (settlement or district)
Sources: Uzpedia: Namangan viloyati
Thermal water site, Namangan region
Chodaksoy hydrogen-sulphide water
- Type
- Well
- Temperature
- 23 °C
- Depth
- 450 m
- Water and use
- H₂S water.
- District
- Pop (Chodak)
- Location
- C: approximate (settlement or district)
Sources: Uzpedia: Namangan viloyati
Thermal water site, Namangan region
Kosonsoy sanatorium spring
- Type
- Natural spring
- Temperature
- 22–27 °C
- Depth
- Spring
- Water and use
- Weakly mineralised alkaline SO₄–Ca–Na water.
- District
- Kosonsoy (Obod, 943 m above sea level)
- Location
- C: approximate (settlement or district)
Sources: Sihatgoh: Kosonsoy sanatorium; Trade union (kasaba) page: Kosonsoy sanatorium
Thermal water site, Andijan region
Khanabad sanatorium
- Type
- Mineral spring and sanatorium
- Temperature
- 18–40 °C
- District
- Khanabad city
- Location
- C: approximate (settlement or district)
Sources: Uzbekistan.travel: Health resorts of Uzbekistan; Asia-Plus (9 Nov 2025): Mineral springs in Central Asia; Sihatgoh: Khanabad sanatorium
Thermal water site, Samarkand region
Abu Ali ibn Sino sanatorium, Nurbuloq
- Type
- Sanatorium well (radon water)
- Temperature
- 37–43 °C
- Depth
- 650 m
- Water and use
- Radon 20–25 nCi/l, Cl–SO₄–Na, pH 8.1, nitrogen gas.
- District
- Nurobod (Nurbuloq)
- Location
- A: published GPS position
Sources: Sihatgoh: Abu Ali ibn Sino sanatorium; Trade union (kasaba) page: Abu Ali ibn Sino sanatorium; Broni.travel: Abu Ali ibn Sino sanatorium (GPS position)
Thermal water site, Navoi region
Oltinsoy (Altynsai) thermal field and sanatorium
- Type
- Thermal field (wells 1-re, 2-re, 1-r, 2-r, 2-p, 5-p)
- Temperature
- 64–70 °C
- Depth
- 135–300 m
- Water and use
- 1.6–1.9 g/l, nitrogen, siliceous, radon-bearing; about 2 l/s. Balneology, heating, greenhouses.
- District
- Xatirchi (Chilash village)
- Location
- C: approximate (settlement or district)
Sources: GeoNames gazetteer; Sihatgoh: Oltinsoy sanatorium; Trade union (kasaba) page: Oltinsoy sanatorium; Milliycha.uz: Termal suvlar (National Encyclopedia of Uzbekistan text); Ismailov et al. (2024); Ismailov et al. (2024)
Thermal water site, Bukhara region
Sitorai Mohi Xosa sanatorium
- Type
- Sanatorium wells
- Temperature
- 40–42 °C (bath); 50–52 °C (drinking)
- Depth
- 40 m (bath); 1,100 m (drinking)
- Water and use
- Na-chloride and SO₄–Cl–Na water.
- District
- Bukhara city
- Location
- A: published GPS position
Sources: Sihatgoh: Sitorai Mohi Xosa sanatorium; Broni.travel: sanatorium listings (stated GPS positions)
Thermal water site, Kashkadarya region
Kashkadaryo sohili sanatorium
- Type
- Sanatorium well
- Temperature
- 37–38 °C (bath)
- Depth
- 1,350 m
- Water and use
- Cl–SO₄–Ca/Na–Mg water.
- District
- Karshi city
- Location
- C: approximate (settlement or district)
Sources: GeoNames gazetteer; Sihatgoh: Kashkadaryo sohili sanatorium
Thermal water site, Surkhandarya region
Termiz Marvaridi sanatorium (Uchqizil resort)
- Type
- Sanatorium wells
- Temperature
- 30–40 °C (H₂S water); 37–38 °C (iodine–bromine water)
- Depth
- 234 m; 390–432 m
- Water and use
- Sulphide 66–93 mg/l; I 23.7, Br 53.5 mg/l.
- District
- Termez district (Uchqizil reservoir)
- Location
- C: approximate (settlement or district)
Sources: Ziyonet: lecture 'Suv va issiqlik bilan davolash. Kurortlar' (PDF); GeoNames gazetteer; Sihatgoh: Termiz Marvaridi sanatorium; Mumindzhanov et al. (2025)
Thermal water site, Surkhandarya region
Uchkyzyl field well
- Type
- Oil-field thermal well
- Temperature
- 40 °C
- Depth
- 1,050.5 m
- Water and use
- Brine 273–320 g/l, I 18–21 mg/l; self-flowing 2.5 l/s.
- District
- Jarqo‘rg‘on and Termez
- Location
- C: approximate (settlement or district)
Sources: GeoNames gazetteer; Turaev & Umbarov (2018). Universum: Technical Sciences 1(46): iodine–bromine waters of Surkhandarya
Thermal water site, Surkhandarya region
Khaudag field, well Kattakum-2
- Type
- Oil-field thermal brine well
- Temperature
- 76 °C (1979); 72 °C (2016) at the wellhead
- Water and use
- Brine 179–220 g/l, I 21–23 mg/l; 414–432 m³/day; 28 atm. Raw material for iodine and bromine.
- District
- Khaudag area
- Location
- C: approximate (settlement or district)
Sources: GeoNames gazetteer; Turaev & Umbarov (2018). Universum: Technical Sciences 1(46): iodine–bromine waters of Surkhandarya; Umbarov (2018). Dissertation abstract: hydrothermal waters of the Khaudag area
Thermal water site, Surkhandarya region
Kokayty (Kakaydi) field
- Type
- Oil-field associated thermal water
- Temperature
- 39–40 °C
- Water and use
- Brine 137–143 g/l, I 14.8 mg/l.
- District
- Jarqo‘rg‘on
- Location
- C: approximate (settlement or district)
Sources: GeoNames gazetteer; Turaev & Umbarov (2018). Universum: Technical Sciences 1(46): iodine–bromine waters of Surkhandarya; Milliycha.uz: Jarqo'rg'on tumani
Thermal water site, Surkhandarya region
Lyalmikor field
- Type
- Oil-field associated water
- Temperature
- 25 °C
- Water and use
- 60 g/l, I 14.7 mg/l.
- District
- Jarqo‘rg‘on
- Location
- C: approximate (settlement or district)
Sources: GeoNames gazetteer; Turaev & Umbarov (2018). Universum: Technical Sciences 1(46): iodine–bromine waters of Surkhandarya
Thermal water site, Surkhandarya region
Xo‘jaipok sanatorium spring
- Type
- Natural spring outflow
- Temperature
- 30–31 °C
- Depth
- Spring
- Water and use
- H₂S water, sulphide 13 mg/l.
- District
- Oltinsoy district (Jobu)
- Location
- C: approximate (settlement or district)
Sources: GeoNames gazetteer; Sihatgoh: Xo'jaipok sanatorium; Mumindzhanov et al. (2025)
Thermal water site, Khorezm region
Khonka (Xonqa) sanatorium
- Type
- Sanatorium well
- Temperature
- 22 °C
- Depth
- 700 m
- Water and use
- Iodine–bromine water.
- District
- Xonqa (Kirkyop village)
- Location
- C: approximate (settlement or district)
Sources: GeoNames gazetteer; Sihatgoh: Khonka sanatorium
Thermal water site, Navoi region
Uchkuduk hot wells (Mingbulak depression)
- Type
- Self-flowing wells drilled in the late 1950s and early 1960s
- Temperature
- up to 46 °C
- Water and use
- SO₄–Cl–Na, relatively weakly mineralised, not fit for drinking; balneological tests were positive for some wells. Used for bathing and recreation; many wells were later plugged with cement.
- District
- Uchkuduk (20–30 km south and south-west of the town)
- Location
- C: approximate (settlement or district)
Sources: Marchenko (2009), Unusual Uchkuduk, Gorniy vestnik Uzbekistana, No. 3 (38), pp. 112–119
Thermal water site, Navoi region
Sugraly uranium mines (Beshbulak depression)
- Type
- Underground uranium mines in the central Kyzylkum, shafts sunk from 1966; four confined aquifers with hot water
- Temperature
- 42–53 °C (mine water and rock); thermal water up to 56 °C
- Depth
- Ore down to 500 m; the main thermal aquifer lies below 411 m in the Kyzylkumsky shaft
- Water and use
- Thermal water aggressive to metals and concrete. Hot mine water was piped out of the workings; refrigeration plants cooled the mines.
- District
- Tomdi (Zarafshan area)
- Location
- C: approximate (settlement or district)
Sources: Malgin (1997); Sattarov & Larionov (2008), Mining bureau of the NMMC Central Research Laboratory, Gorniy vestnik Uzbekistana, No. 3 (34), pp. 93–95; GeoNames: Zarafshan railway station, also called Sugraly (location)
Thermal water site, Tashkent city
Semashko clinic, wells No. 1 and 2
- Type
- Clinic wells
- Temperature
- 47–47.5 °C
- Depth
- 2,058 m, filters at 1,687–1,776 m (well 1); 1,902 m (well 2)
- Water and use
- Cl–SO₄–HCO₃–Na, 0.8 g/l, pH 7.55–8.1. Used by the clinic and a bottling shop.
- Location
- B: facility pin on an online map
Sources: Aitmetova & Meylieva (2021)
Thermal water site, Tashkent city
Tashkent well No. 3
- Type
- Thermal well
- Temperature
- 62 °C
- Depth
- 2,435 m
- Water and use
- SO₄–HCO₃–Na, 1.1 g/l, pH 8.2. Supplies two physiotherapy hospitals in Tashkent. The point is the city centre; the well’s position is not known.
- Location
- C: approximate (settlement or district)
Sources: Aitmetova & Meylieva (2021)
Thermal water site, Tashkent city
Karakamysh well No. 5pr
- Type
- Exploration well
- Temperature
- 22–24 °C
- Depth
- 2,375 m
- Water and use
- HCO₃–Cl–Na, 1.3–1.7 g/l, pH 8.2–8.3; organic carbon up to 12 mg/l.
- District
- Olmazor (Karakamysh)
- Location
- B: facility pin on an online map
Sources: Aitmetova & Meylieva (2021)
Thermal water site, Tashkent region
Semurg sanatorium, well No. 6pr
- Type
- Sanatorium well
- Temperature
- 58 °C
- Depth
- 1,900 m
- Water and use
- Self-flowing, 2.5 l/s; 0.8 g/l; silicic acid up to 72 mg/l, organic carbon up to 19 mg/l.
- District
- Zangiota (Eshonguzar)
- Location
- B: facility pin on an online map
Sources: Aitmetova & Meylieva (2021); Bakiev et al. (2022); Ismailov et al. (2024)
Thermal water site, Tashkent region
Chirchik, well 3-pr
- Type
- Self-flowing well
- Temperature
- 55 °C at the outflow
- Water and use
- Chloride–sodium water of up to 4 g/l from Palaeozoic limestones; wells 3-pr (Chirchik) and 8-pr (Kibray) give 20–40 l/s. The point is the city centre.
- District
- Chirchik city
- Location
- C: approximate (settlement or district)
Sources: Bakiev et al. (2022)
Thermal water site, Tashkent region
Kibray, well 8-pr
- Type
- Self-flowing well
- Temperature
- 55 °C at the outflow
- Water and use
- Chloride–sodium water of up to 4 g/l from Palaeozoic limestones; wells 3-pr (Chirchik) and 8-pr (Kibray) give 20–40 l/s. The point is the town centre.
- District
- Qibray
- Location
- C: approximate (settlement or district)
Sources: Bakiev et al. (2022)
Thermal water site, Samarkand region
Kattakurgan well
- Type
- Self-flowing well
- Temperature
- 45 °C
- Depth
- 600 m
- Water and use
- Pressurised water of the Palaeogene (Bukhara stage) and Upper Cretaceous of the Zarafshan basin: up to 2 g/l, mainly chloride–sodium and sulphate–sodium; flowing wells give 17 l/s. The point is the town centre.
- District
- Kattaqo‘rg‘on
- Location
- C: approximate (settlement or district)
Sources: Bakiev et al. (2022)
Thermal water site, Samarkand region
Nurabad thermal water wells
- Type
- Water-supply wells used for hot water
- Temperature
- 36 °C (three wells); 37–40 °C (well No. 9)
- Depth
- 300 m (three wells)
- Water and use
- Three wells about 4.5 km from the town supply hot water: in summer straight to homes and public buildings, in winter to the boiler house. Well No. 9 of the Janub water intake, 5–5.5 km from the boiler house, has given drinking water since 1980 and the town’s hot water since 2008. The point is the town centre.
- District
- Nurobod (Nurabad town)
- Location
- C: approximate (settlement or district)
Sources: Shemetov & Kimelfeld (2008); Sanakulov & Dedov (2011); Isunts et al. (2018)
Thermal water site, Bukhara region
Umid area, hydrogeological well
- Type
- Deep well
- Temperature
- 92 °C at the outflow
- Depth
- 2,950 m
- Water and use
- Formation water of the Upper Jurassic beds of the Bukhara–Karshi artesian basin.
- District
- Dengizkul uplift
- Location
- C: approximate (settlement or district)
Sources: Bakiev et al. (2022)
Thermal water site, Surkhandarya region
Jayronkhona sanatorium, well IX
- Type
- Sanatorium well
- Temperature
- 37–40 °C
- Water and use
- Cl–Na, 26.9–28.6 g/l, pH 6.2–6.6; H₂S 250–600 mg/l, I 23.7 mg/l, Br 53.5 mg/l. From Palaeogene (Alay) limestone and shell rock.
- District
- Termez district
- Location
- B: facility pin on an online map
Sources: Mumindzhanov et al. (2025)
Thermal water site, Surkhandarya region
Uchkizil sanatorium, well XII
- Type
- Sanatorium well
- Temperature
- 40 °C
- Water and use
- Cl–Na, 60–65.4 g/l, pH 8.1; H₂S 340–400 mg/l. From Senonian sandstone.
- District
- Jarqo‘rg‘on (Uchqizil village)
- Location
- B: facility pin on an online map
Sources: Mumindzhanov et al. (2025)
Thermal water site, Surkhandarya region
Marvarid sanatorium, well XII
- Type
- Sanatorium well
- Temperature
- 21–24 °C
- Water and use
- SO₄–Cl–Na, 28.01 g/l, pH 6.3; H₂S 350–400 mg/l. From Senonian sandstone.
- District
- Termez district (Uchqizil)
- Location
- C: approximate (settlement or district)
Sources: Mumindzhanov et al. (2025)
Thermal water site, Republic of Karakalpakstan
Thermal aquifer under the dried Aral Sea bed
- Type
- Self-flowing wells
- Temperature
- 38–41 °C
- Depth
- Top of the aquifer at 380–520 m
- Water and use
- Confined Turonian–Lower Senonian sands; 1.4–1.9 g/l, sulphate–chloride, hardness 2.6–6.5 mg-eq/l. Heads 0.5–15 m above the ground, 4–12 l/s; well 1or flows freely at 12 l/s. The point is the centre of the surveyed map sheet.
- District
- Dried south-eastern bed of the Aral Sea
- Location
- C: approximate (settlement or district)
Sources: Mavlyanov & Iztileuov (2024)
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Muynak
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 24–30 °C
- Mineralisation
- 42 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₁al-K₁ne-ap
- Approved operating reserves
- A+C₁ – 1300 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Gulparshin
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 22–39 °C
- Mineralisation
- 2–49.6 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₁al
- Approved operating reserves
- A+B – 1296 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Kungrad
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 30–35 °C
- Mineralisation
- 151.6 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₁al
- Approved operating reserves
- A+C₁ – 298 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Takhtakupyr
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 34 °C
- Mineralisation
- 2.9 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₁al
- Approved operating reserves
- B+C₁ – 441 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Karauzyak
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 34 °C
- Mineralisation
- 2.9 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₁al
- Approved operating reserves
- B+C₁ – 587 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Chimbay
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 30–37 °C
- Mineralisation
- 2–49 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂t
- Approved operating reserves
- A+C₁ – 1900 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Kegeyli
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 29–31 °C
- Mineralisation
- 31.6 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₁al-K₂t
- Approved operating reserves
- B+C₁ – 441 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Akmangit
- Water temperature at the outflow
- up to {v} 35 °C
- Mineralisation
- up to {v} 35 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂cm
- Approved operating reserves
- B+C₁ – 475 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Khodzheyli
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 27–30 °C
- Mineralisation
- 14.2–15 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂sn
- Approved operating reserves
- B+C₁ – 328 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Nukus
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 20–37 °C
- Mineralisation
- 4–6 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂
- Approved operating reserves
- A+B+C₁ – 1944 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Takhiatash
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 25–28 °C
- Mineralisation
- 37–81 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂sn-K₁al
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Mangit
- Water temperature at the outflow
- up to {v} 35 °C
- Mineralisation
- over {v} 35 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂cm
- Approved operating reserves
- B+C₁ – 259 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Klychbay
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 21–26 °C
- Mineralisation
- 151.6 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂cm-K₁al
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Sarybiy
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 53 °C
- Mineralisation
- 39.4 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂t-sn
- Approved operating reserves
- B+C₁ – 190 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Turtkul
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 43–65 °C
- Mineralisation
- 9.8–15.2 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂t
- Approved operating reserves
- A+B+C₁ – 1296 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Gazalkent
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 47.2 °C
- Mineralisation
- 0.8 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂cm
- Approved operating reserves
- A+C₁+C₂ – 453 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Chalysh
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 41 °C
- Mineralisation
- 13.5 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂
- Approved operating reserves
- A+C₁ – 86 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Koshkupyr
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 46 °C
- Mineralisation
- 46.3 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Keles
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 63 °C
- Mineralisation
- 0.6 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂cm
- Approved operating reserves
- A – 81 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Urgench
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 46 °C
- Mineralisation
- 23 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂
- Approved operating reserves
- A+C₂ – 864 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Kibray
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 32–56 °C
- Mineralisation
- 0.9–2.3 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂cm
- Approved operating reserves
- A – 242 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
North-Eastern
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 50–56 °C
- Mineralisation
- 0.8–0.94 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂cm
- Approved operating reserves
- A – 200 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Western
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 55–57 °C
- Mineralisation
- 0.9 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂cm
- Approved operating reserves
- A – 470 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Khanki
- Water temperature at the outflow
- over {v} 35 °C
- Mineralisation
- 24–41 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂
- Approved operating reserves
- A+C₁ – 432 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Tashkent
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 20–66 °C
- Mineralisation
- 0.8–1.7 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂cm
- Approved operating reserves
- A+B+C₁ – 1416 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Khiva
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 46 °C
- Mineralisation
- 58–61 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂
- Approved operating reserves
- A+C₂ – 277 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Kuuksaray
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 88 °C
- Mineralisation
- 0.9 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂sn
- Approved operating reserves
- A – 147 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Mersian
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 41–67 °C
- Mineralisation
- 1.4–2.3 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- P
- Approved operating reserves
- A – 133 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Kasansay
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 20–28 °C
- Mineralisation
- 0.7–2.77 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K-P
- Approved operating reserves
- A – 398 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Zangiata
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 75.1 °C
- Mineralisation
- 3.6–3.9 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₁ap-al
- Approved operating reserves
- A+B+C₂ – 515 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Chartak
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 30–68 °C
- Mineralisation
- up to {v} 112 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- N₁msg
- Approved operating reserves
- B – 2451 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Dustlik
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 41–48 °C
- Mineralisation
- 1–1.3 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- P
- Approved operating reserves
- A – 110 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Uchkurgan
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 22 °C
- Mineralisation
- 9.35 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- N₁msg
- Approved operating reserves
- A – 35 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Yangiyul
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 47–69 °C
- Mineralisation
- 1–2.3 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂cm
- Approved operating reserves
- A – 173 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Chust
- Water temperature at the outflow
- up to {v} 35 °C
- Mineralisation
- 5.6 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- N₁
- Approved operating reserves
- C₂ – 5 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Namangan
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 30–51 °C
- Mineralisation
- up to {v} 60 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- N₁msg
- Approved operating reserves
- A+B – 730 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Madaniyat
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 35–40 °C
- Mineralisation
- 1.3 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- N₁msg
- Approved operating reserves
- A – 100 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Irvadan
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 38 °C
- Mineralisation
- 0.8 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- N₂bt-Q₁sh
- Approved operating reserves
- A+B – 187 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Pravda
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 41–60 °C
- Mineralisation
- 0.8–0.9 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂cm
- Approved operating reserves
- B+C₁ – 309 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Shakhand
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 54 °C
- Mineralisation
- up to {v} 55 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- N₁msg-Q₁sh
- Approved operating reserves
- A+B+C₁ – 732 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Andijan
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 30–40 °C
- Mineralisation
- 20–26 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- N₁msg
- Approved operating reserves
- B – 30 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
South Alamyshyk
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 45 °C
- Mineralisation
- 14 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- N
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Gurumsaray
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 55 °C
- Mineralisation
- 4.2 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- N₁msg
- Approved operating reserves
- C₂ – 176 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Gurtepa
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 81 °C
- Mineralisation
- up to {v} 35 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- N₁
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Malek
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 47 °C
- Mineralisation
- 2.4–2.5 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂cm
- Approved operating reserves
- B+C₁ – 1209 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Shakhrikhan
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 28–34 °C
- Mineralisation
- 68.8 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- N₁msg
- Approved operating reserves
- A+B+C₁ – 50 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Sufikishlok
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 42 °C
- Mineralisation
- 1.5–3 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Buston-Buvo
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 63 °C
- Mineralisation
- 80–113 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- N₁msg
- Approved operating reserves
- C₁ – 176 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Khodzhaabad
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 40 °C
- Mineralisation
- 4 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₁
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Yerzhar
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 25–36 °C
- Mineralisation
- 1.49–11 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- P-N
- Approved operating reserves
- A+B+C – 268 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Tinchlik
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 34.5 °C
- Mineralisation
- 0.6 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- N₂bt-Q₁sh
- Approved operating reserves
- A – 70 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Kokand
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 30–41 °C
- Mineralisation
- 8–22 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- N₁msg-N₂bt
- Approved operating reserves
- A – 90 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Uzbekiston (Iskra)
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 23–25 °C
- Mineralisation
- 4.7–5.5 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- N₂bt-Q₁sh
- Approved operating reserves
- A – 67 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Tashlak
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 25 °C
- Mineralisation
- 0.5–0.7 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- N₂bt
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Markhamat
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 33 °C
- Mineralisation
- over {v} 35 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- N
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Surkhtepa
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 25–30 °C
- Mineralisation
- 3.8–4 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- N₂bt
- Approved operating reserves
- A – 50 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Kyzyl-Tepa
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 37–43 °C
- Mineralisation
- 0.48–0.7 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- N₂bt
- Approved operating reserves
- A – 560 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Bagdad
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 27 °C
- Mineralisation
- 0.48 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- N₂bt
- Approved operating reserves
- C₂ – 225 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Toshkentlikguzar
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 24 °C
- Mineralisation
- 0.26 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- N₂bt
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Buston
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 23–24 °C
- Mineralisation
- 8–9 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- N₂bt
- Approved operating reserves
- B+C₁ – 103 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Gulistan
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 67–72 °C
- Mineralisation
- 2.56 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂sn
- Approved operating reserves
- A+C₁ – 513 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Zadian
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 37.5 °C
- Mineralisation
- 14.1 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- N₂bt
- Approved operating reserves
- A – 138 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Yaypan
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 24 °C
- Mineralisation
- 07,1,3 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- N₂bt
- Approved operating reserves
- A – 50 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Rapkan
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 27 °C
- Mineralisation
- 27 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- N₁msg
- Approved operating reserves
- A – 30 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Farkhad
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 42 °C
- Mineralisation
- 18.8 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- Pz
- Approved operating reserves
- A+B – 43 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Fergana
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 20–26 °C
- Mineralisation
- 0.4–20 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- N₂bt
- Approved operating reserves
- A – 50 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Shirin
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 32 °C
- Mineralisation
- 47.2 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂
- Approved operating reserves
- C₁ – 60 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Chimion
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 22–41 °C
- Mineralisation
- 3.1–9.86 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂-P
- Approved operating reserves
- A – 868 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Bekabad
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 51 °C
- Mineralisation
- 4.6–4.8 g/l
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Khavatag
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 60–62 °C
- Mineralisation
- 4.2 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- Pz
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Koshrabad
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 20 °C
- Mineralisation
- 2.48 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- Pz
- Approved operating reserves
- B+C₂ – 898 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Gallyaaral
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 20–22 °C
- Mineralisation
- 2.85 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- N₂
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Altynsai
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 59–70 °C
- Mineralisation
- 1.6–1.9 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- N₂
- Approved operating reserves
- A+B – 2972; C₁ – 657 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Khumor
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 40 °C
- Mineralisation
- 3.2 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Kattakurgan
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 45 °C
- Mineralisation
- 4.8 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂sn
- Approved operating reserves
- A+B+C – 1600 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Dzhuyzar
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 53–54 °C
- Mineralisation
- 1.3 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂sm
- Approved operating reserves
- A+B+C₁ – 968 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Bukhara
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 46 °C
- Mineralisation
- 2.8 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Sitorai Mokhi Khosa
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 46–47 °C
- Mineralisation
- 3.24–3.4 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂t-sn
- Approved operating reserves
- A+B+C₁ – 665 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Samarkand
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 30–46 °C
- Mineralisation
- 1.3–2.3 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂
- Approved operating reserves
- B+C₁+C₂ – 1393 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Nagornoye
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 40–44 °C
- Mineralisation
- 0.8–1.35 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂
- Approved operating reserves
- A+B – 716 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Yurun-Bolo
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 53–63 °C
- Mineralisation
- 1.6 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂
- Approved operating reserves
- A – 35 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Agalyk
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 22 °C
- Mineralisation
- 2.2 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂
- Approved operating reserves
- C₁+C₂ – 133 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Karakul
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 20–24 °C
- Mineralisation
- 11–13.6 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- P-N
- Approved operating reserves
- C₂ – 90 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Agron
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 70 °C
- Mineralisation
- 0.9 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Turon
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 42 °C
- Mineralisation
- 0.47 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Mubarek
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 38–78 °C
- Mineralisation
- 1.34–4 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂t-sn
- Approved operating reserves
- A+B+C₁ – 4142 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Maydo-yobi
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 60 °C
- Mineralisation
- 0.85 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Dultali
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 50 °C
- Mineralisation
- 1 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Khodzhakuduk
- Water temperature at the outflow
- up to {v} 35 °C
- Mineralisation
- up to {v} 5 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂t-sn
- Approved operating reserves
- C₁ – 40 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Karluk
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 60 °C
- Mineralisation
- 1.6 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Shakhrisabz
- Water temperature at the outflow
- over {v} 42 °C
- Mineralisation
- 2.4 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Gaushmon
- Water temperature at the outflow
- over {v} 42 °C
- Mineralisation
- 0.61 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- QII
- Approved operating reserves
- B+C₁ – 700 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Karabair
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 60 °C
- Mineralisation
- 1.3 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Uyrot
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 60–65 °C
- Mineralisation
- 1.14 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Kashkadaryo Sokhili
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 38 °C
- Mineralisation
- 2.8 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂cm
- Approved operating reserves
- A+B+C₁ – 103 thousand m³/day (the unit given in the map’s legend)
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
Thermal water area (2022 map)
Kamashi
- Water temperature at the outflow
- 18–20 °C
- Mineralisation
- 1.3–1.44 g/l
- Age of the water-bearing rocks
- K₂-N
Source: Bakiev et al. (2022), Fig. 2, a schematic map of thermal waters of Uzbekistan at 1:1,000,000. Values as printed on the map.
GNIP station, isotopes in precipitation
Tashkent
- Elevation
- 467 m
- Samples
- 30, 2022–2025
- Local meteoric water line
- δ²H = 7.46 δ¹⁸O + 6.30
Source: Isabekov et al. (2026), Table 1.
- Study
- Isabekov (2026)
- Period
- 2022–2024
- δ¹⁸O
- mean −7.78‰, from −16.34 to 1.95‰, standard deviation 4.19‰
- δ²H
- mean −49.22‰, from −122.73 to 16.41‰, standard deviation 35.71‰
- Meteoric water line for Uzbekistan
- δ²H = 7.40 δ¹⁸O + 7.81, 6 stations together
Source: Isabekov (2026), Table 2; the line for Uzbekistan, Fig. 7.
- Period
- 2022–2023
- δ¹⁸O
- from −16.34 to 1.95‰
- δ²H
- from −122.73 to 16.41‰
- Local meteoric water line
- δ²H = 7.33 δ¹⁸O + 5.27, with the 1971 data
Source: Nishonov et al. (2024), text.
GNIP station, isotopes in precipitation
Angren
- Elevation
- 945 m
- Samples
- 34, 2022–2025
- Local meteoric water line
- δ²H = 7.93 δ¹⁸O + 15.16
Source: Isabekov et al. (2026), Table 1.
- Study
- Isabekov (2026)
- Period
- 2022–2024
- δ¹⁸O
- mean −7.89‰, from −15.28 to −0.14‰, standard deviation 4.36‰
- δ²H
- mean −48.95‰, from −108.39 to 6.43‰, standard deviation 34.83‰
- Meteoric water line for Uzbekistan
- δ²H = 7.40 δ¹⁸O + 7.81, 6 stations together
Source: Isabekov (2026), Table 2; the line for Uzbekistan, Fig. 7.
GNIP station, isotopes in precipitation
Bashkizilsay
- Location
- approximate: 41°17′ N, 69°40′ E as in Table 1 of Isabekov et al. (2026), between Tashkent and Angren. The GNIP station map in Nishonov et al. (2024), Fig. 2, shows a station named Chotqol (Chatkal) there; Fig. 1 of Isabekov et al. (2026) shows Bashkizilsay east of Angren.
- Elevation
- 1,272 m
- Period
- 2022–2025
- Local meteoric water line
- δ²H = 7.93 δ¹⁸O + 13.90
Source: Isabekov et al. (2026), Table 1.
- Study
- Isabekov (2026)
- Period
- 2022–2024
- δ¹⁸O
- mean −9.20‰, from −17.66 to −0.86‰, standard deviation 3.88‰
- δ²H
- mean −56.26‰, from −125.80 to 5.82‰, standard deviation 31.87‰
- Meteoric water line for Uzbekistan
- δ²H = 7.40 δ¹⁸O + 7.81, 6 stations together
Source: Isabekov (2026), Table 2; the line for Uzbekistan, Fig. 7.
GNIP station, isotopes in precipitation
Fergana
- Elevation
- 582 m
- Samples
- 31, 2022–2025
- Local meteoric water line
- δ²H = 7.40 δ¹⁸O + 3.13
Source: Isabekov et al. (2026), Table 1.
- Study
- Isabekov (2026)
- Period
- 2022–2024
- δ¹⁸O
- mean −6.81‰, from −15.52 to 2.21‰, standard deviation 5.35‰
- δ²H
- mean −45.10‰, from −114.61 to 18.82‰, standard deviation 37.47‰
- Meteoric water line for Uzbekistan
- δ²H = 7.40 δ¹⁸O + 7.81, 6 stations together
Source: Isabekov (2026), Table 2; the line for Uzbekistan, Fig. 7.
GNIP station, isotopes in precipitation
Samarkand
- Elevation
- 726 m
- Samples
- 29, 2022–2025
- Local meteoric water line
- δ²H = 7.86 δ¹⁸O + 11.07
Source: Isabekov et al. (2026), Table 1.
- Study
- Isabekov (2026)
- Period
- 2022–2024
- δ¹⁸O
- mean −6.77‰, from −14.35 to 1.10‰, standard deviation 4.12‰
- δ²H
- mean −42.59‰, from −98.44 to 18.82‰, standard deviation 30.25‰
- Meteoric water line for Uzbekistan
- δ²H = 7.40 δ¹⁸O + 7.81, 6 stations together
Source: Isabekov (2026), Table 2; the line for Uzbekistan, Fig. 7.
GNIP station, isotopes in precipitation
Shakhrisabz
- Elevation
- 625 m
- Samples
- 24, 2022–2025
- Local meteoric water line
- δ²H = 8.22 δ¹⁸O + 18.26
Source: Isabekov et al. (2026), Table 1.
- Study
- Isabekov (2026)
- Period
- 2022–2024
- δ¹⁸O
- mean −6.98‰, from −19.87 to 0.02‰, standard deviation 5.17‰
- δ²H
- mean −34.71‰, from −148.10 to 21.60‰, standard deviation 40.21‰
- Meteoric water line for Uzbekistan
- δ²H = 7.40 δ¹⁸O + 7.81, 6 stations together
Source: Isabekov (2026), Table 2; the line for Uzbekistan, Fig. 7.
Precipitation sampling site
Oygaing
- Site code
- CHK1
- Elevation
- 1,490 m
- Samples
- 196, January 2020 – October 2021
- Chirchik catchment, three sites together
- 272 samples: δ¹⁸O −8.2‰, δ²H −55‰, d-excess 10.4‰ (supplement, Table S1)
Source: Saidaliyeva et al. (2024), Table 1.
Precipitation sampling site
Pskem
- Site code
- CHK2
- Elevation
- 1,255 m
- Samples
- 30, November 2020 – July 2021
- Chirchik catchment, three sites together
- 272 samples: δ¹⁸O −8.2‰, δ²H −55‰, d-excess 10.4‰ (supplement, Table S1)
Source: Saidaliyeva et al. (2024), Table 1.
Precipitation sampling site
Tashkent
- Site code
- CHK3
- Elevation
- 486 m
- Samples
- 46, November 2020 – October 2021
- Chirchik catchment, three sites together
- 272 samples: δ¹⁸O −8.2‰, δ²H −55‰, d-excess 10.4‰ (supplement, Table S1)
Source: Saidaliyeva et al. (2024), Table 1.
Glacier ice, snow, river water and rain
Barkrak glacier, upper Pskem basin
- Location
- approximate: the Barkrak glacier as mapped in OpenStreetMap. The study prints no coordinates; its Fig. 1 shows the sampling places on and below the glacier and along the Oygaing River, including at the Oygaing weather station.
- Samples
- 120, August 2018 and August 2019
- Local meteoric water line
- δ²H = 7.60 δ¹⁸O + 11.00
- Local evaporation line
- δ²H = 3.24 δ¹⁸O − 43.10
| Type | n | δ¹⁸O, ‰ | δ²H, ‰ |
|---|---|---|---|
| rain | 2 | −2.55−4.81 to −0.28 | −14.7−20.7 to −8.7 |
| snow | 35 | −14.20−19.48 to −10.85 | −97.7−142.3 to −64.9 |
| glacier ice | 11 | −14.81−17.49 to −13.24 | −101.4−120.7 to −89.6 |
| river water | 57 | −13.92−15.76 to −12.02 | −94.2−108.4 to −77.5 |
| river water enriched by evaporation | 15 | −6.32−11.26 to −3.02 | −63.5−82.3 to −54.7 |
Source: Umirzakov et al. (2023), Tables 1 and 2.
Precipitation sampling site
Dushanbe
- Site code
- KF1
- Elevation
- 816 m
- Samples
- 7, October 2018 – October 2019
Source: Saidaliyeva et al. (2024), Table 1.
Precipitation sampling site
Kazaly
| Date | Type | δ¹⁸O, ‰ | δ²H, ‰ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 December 2021 | snow | −12.91 | −92.91 |
| 11 February 2022 | snow | −8.25 | −57.83 |
| 23 April 2022 | rain | −7.75 | −57.25 |
| 1 January 2023 | snow | −9.86 | −64.07 |
| 1 January 2023 | rain | −17.64 | −135.85 |
| 4 February 2023 | snow | −12.31 | −82 |
| 18 April 2023 | rain | 0.55 | −5.58 |
| 17 July 2023 | rain | −1.63 | −14.15 |
| 8 November 2023 | rain | −6.8 | −49.4 |
Source: Yapiyev et al. (2024), data file (Mendeley Data).
Surface water sample
Aral Sea
| Date | Type | δ¹⁸O, ‰ | δ²H, ‰ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 October 2022 | lake water | 4.34 | −4.3 |
Source: Yapiyev et al. (2024), data file (Mendeley Data).
Surface water sample
Syr Darya
| Date | Type | δ¹⁸O, ‰ | δ²H, ‰ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 June 2023 | river water | −6.83 | −53.42 |
Source: Yapiyev et al. (2024), data file (Mendeley Data).
1 study at this place
Barkrak glacier, upper Pskem basin
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
3 studies at this place
Tashkent
- Stable isotopes in atmospheric precipitation of Tashkent city
- Spatial features of chemical and isotopic composition of atmospheric precipitation in Uzbekistan
- Analysis of the Stable Isotopic Composition of Precipitation in Uzbekistan Using Different Regression Methods
Location: A: coordinates printed in the study.
1 study at this place
Middle Zarafshan oases (Samarkand and Kattakurgan oases)
Location: D: centre of a whole basin or region.
1 study at this place
Jomboy District (observation well 221)
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Narpay District (observation wells 313 and 186)
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Nurobod District (observation wells 147 and 30(2))
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Sokh alluvial fan (observation wells 21, 28, 258, 259)
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Kokand weather station
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Sokh River at Sarikanda gauging station
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
2 studies at this place
Angren
- Spatial features of chemical and isotopic composition of atmospheric precipitation in Uzbekistan
- Analysis of the Stable Isotopic Composition of Precipitation in Uzbekistan Using Different Regression Methods
Location: A: coordinates printed in the study.
2 studies at this place
Bashkizilsay
- Spatial features of chemical and isotopic composition of atmospheric precipitation in Uzbekistan
- Analysis of the Stable Isotopic Composition of Precipitation in Uzbekistan Using Different Regression Methods
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
2 studies at this place
Fergana
- Spatial features of chemical and isotopic composition of atmospheric precipitation in Uzbekistan
- Analysis of the Stable Isotopic Composition of Precipitation in Uzbekistan Using Different Regression Methods
Location: A: coordinates printed in the study.
2 studies at this place
Samarkand
- Spatial features of chemical and isotopic composition of atmospheric precipitation in Uzbekistan
- Analysis of the Stable Isotopic Composition of Precipitation in Uzbekistan Using Different Regression Methods
Location: A: coordinates printed in the study.
2 studies at this place
Shakhrisabz
- Spatial features of chemical and isotopic composition of atmospheric precipitation in Uzbekistan
- Analysis of the Stable Isotopic Composition of Precipitation in Uzbekistan Using Different Regression Methods
Location: A: coordinates printed in the study.
1 study at this place
Dushanbe Artesian Basin, pilot GSHP boreholes in central Dushanbe
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
2 studies at this place
Khoja-Obi-Garm, Gissar Range · Khoja-Obi-Garm field and spa, Gissar Range
- Geochemistry of Thermal and Cold Mineral Water and Gases of the Tien Shan and the Pamir
- Low-enthalpy thermal waters within Khoja-Obi-Garm field (Republic of Tajikistan)
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Djelandy thermal spring, south-western Pamir
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Garm-Chasma thermal spring, Pamir
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Kara-Shoro CO₂ spring, Fergana Range
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Chimion oil field and H₂S water deposit
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
2 studies at this place
Oygaing · Oygaing weather station, Pskem basin
- Precipitation in the mountains of Central Asia: isotopic composition and source regions
- Significant reduction of river discharge in the mountainous basins of Uzbekistan over the last decades
Location: A: coordinates printed in the study; B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Pskem
Location: A: coordinates printed in the study.
1 study at this place
Tashkent
Location: A: coordinates printed in the study.
1 study at this place
Dushanbe
Location: A: coordinates printed in the study.
2 studies at this place
Fergana basin · Fergana Valley and Chatkal Range study area
- Oil and Gas Resources of the Fergana Basin (Uzbekistan, Tadzhikistan, and Kyrgyzstan)
- Identifying geothermal prospectivity zones in the Fergana Valley through lineament density and land surface temperature anomalies
Location: D: centre of a whole basin or region.
1 study at this place
Mingbulak field
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Gumkhana field
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
North Sokh field
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
3 studies at this place
Bukhara–Khiva region
- Hydrogeochemical features of groundwater in the Mesozoic sediments of the Bukhara-Khiva oil and gas region
- Hydrogeological aspects of oil and gas potential of Mesozoic deposits of the Bukhara-Khiva oil and gas region
- The state of the hydrocarbon potential of the Cretaceous sediments of Western Uzbekistan and the prospects for increasing oil and gas reserves
Location: D: centre of a whole basin or region.
2 studies at this place
Well Eshonkuduk 1
- Hydrogeochemical features of groundwater in the Mesozoic sediments of the Bukhara-Khiva oil and gas region
- Hydrogeological factors of petroleum and gas capability of Jurassic deposits of the Chardzhou stage
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
2 studies at this place
Izgancha field
- Hydrogeochemical features of groundwater in the Mesozoic sediments of the Bukhara-Khiva oil and gas region
- Hydrogeological factors of petroleum and gas capability of Jurassic deposits of the Chardzhou stage
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
2 studies at this place
Nishan field
- Hydrogeochemical features of groundwater in the Mesozoic sediments of the Bukhara-Khiva oil and gas region
- Hydrodynamic features of the Upper Jurassic deposits of the Bukhara-Khiva oil and gas region
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
3 studies at this place
Urtabulak field
- Hydrogeochemical features of groundwater in the Mesozoic sediments of the Bukhara-Khiva oil and gas region
- Hydrogeological factors of petroleum and gas capability of Jurassic deposits of the Chardzhou stage
- Oil and gas potential of the Jurassic terrigenous formation of the Dengizkul uplift
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
South Zekry area
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
2 studies at this place
Beshkent trough
- Hydrodynamic features of the Upper Jurassic deposits of the Bukhara-Khiva oil and gas region
- Study of anomalously high formation pressure of the Beshkent trough of the Bukhara-Khiva oil and gas bearing region
Location: D: centre of a whole basin or region.
1 study at this place
Chilgumbaz field
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Shurtan field
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Shurasan area
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
3 studies at this place
Buzakhur field · Buzakhur area
- Hydrodynamic features of the Upper Jurassic deposits of the Bukhara-Khiva oil and gas region
- Structural-tectonic features and oil and gas potential of the Cretaceous deposits of the Bukhara-Khiva region
- The state of the hydrocarbon potential of the Cretaceous sediments of Western Uzbekistan and the prospects for increasing oil and gas reserves
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
North Ustyurt basin
Location: D: centre of a whole basin or region.
2 studies at this place
Kosbulak depression · Kosbulak Trough
- Petroleum Geology and Resources of the North Ustyurt Basin, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan
- Source-Rock Potential of Jurassic Deposits on the Northern and South-Western Flanks of the Kosbulak Trough (North Ustyurt Basin, Kazakhstan): Evidence from Rock-Eval Pyrolysis of Two Exploration Wells
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Barsakelmes depression
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Sudochi depression
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Bukhara step
Location: D: centre of a whole basin or region.
4 studies at this place
Chardzhou step
- Petroleum Geology and Resources of the Amu-Darya Basin, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Afghanistan, and Iran
- Structural-tectonic features and oil and gas potential of the Cretaceous deposits of the Bukhara-Khiva region
- Hydrogeological factors of petroleum and gas capability of Jurassic deposits of the Chardzhou stage
- Hydrogeological criteria for forecasting the oil and gas potential of the Andakli area of the Bukhara-Khiva region
Location: D: centre of a whole basin or region.
1 study at this place
Gazli field
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Kokdumalak field
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Urtabulak field
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
2 studies at this place
Alan field
- Structural-tectonic features and oil and gas potential of the Cretaceous deposits of the Bukhara-Khiva region
- Oil and gas potential of the Jurassic terrigenous formation of the Dengizkul uplift
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
North Urtabulak field
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Pamuk field
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Karail area
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
“Mubarak” geothermal source, Mubarak district
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
“Karlyk” geothermal source, Mubarak district
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
“Otkuduk” geothermal source
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
“Chirokchi” geothermal source
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
South-Western Gissar region
Location: D: centre of a whole basin or region.
1 study at this place
Gumbulak field
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Dehkanabad field
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Chatyrtepa field
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
South Tandyrcha field
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Atar area
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
8 m well, Angor
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Koson district
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Muborak district
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Nishon district
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Qamashi district
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Muruntau area
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Muruntau survey area
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Krasnogorsk survey area
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Kazaly
Location: A: coordinates printed in the study.
1 study at this place
Aral Sea
Location: A: coordinates printed in the study.
1 study at this place
Syr Darya
Location: A: coordinates printed in the study.
1 study at this place
Chartak No. 2 observation well, North Fergana fault zone
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Jizzakh Region (irrigated districts)
Location: D: centre of a whole basin or region.
1 study at this place
Zafarabad District
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Sharof Rashidov District
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Pretashkent artesian basin (Chirchik and Akhangaran valleys)
Location: D: centre of a whole basin or region.
1 study at this place
Thermal mineral water wells of Tashkent
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Tashkent Mineral Waters (Tashminvody), wells 5/1 and 6/2
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Nazarbek sanatorium, well 1tn
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Zangiota Zam-Zam sanatorium, well 7pr
Location: A: coordinates printed in the study.
1 study at this place
Botanika sanatorium, well 10/81bis
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Chotqol sanatorium, Gazalkent well 5-t
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Geothermal exploration target zones, south-eastern Chatkal Range
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
North-western target zone (1.7 km²), Chatkal Range
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Dried south-eastern bed of the Aral Sea, map sheet L-41-XXXI
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Surkhandarya artesian basin
Location: D: centre of a whole basin or region.
1 study at this place
Jayronkhona sanatorium, well IX
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Uchkizil sanatorium, well XII
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Termiz Marvaridi sanatorium
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Omonkhona spring
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Khojaipok spring
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Mullakhol gas-oil area
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Akkum gas-oil area
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
West Maimanak structure
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Aizavat structure
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Alyaudy structure
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Ilim field
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Shimoliy Tegermen field
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
North Syuzma field
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
North Maimanak field
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Dengizkul uplift
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Umid field
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Dengizkul field
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Khorezm region
Location: D: centre of a whole basin or region.
1 study at this place
Well Khorezm (Yangi-Aryk) 1OP, Yangiaryk area
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Well Khazarasp 1P, Khazarasp area
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Well Yangi-Bazar 1P, Yangibazar area
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
4 studies at this place
Nurabad · Nurabad uranium ore field
- Development of renewable energy sources at the Navoi combine
- Strategy of transition to energy-efficient production at the Navoi MMC
- Course towards energy saving
- Features of radon behaviour in various groundwaters
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map; C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Kandym gas-condensate field
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Gazli gas field
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Sugraly uranium deposit (Beshbulak depression)
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
2 studies at this place
Uchkuduk uranium deposit · Uchkuduk uranium ore field
- Analysis of experience in mining sedimentary deposits of the Uchkuduk type
- Features of radon behaviour in various groundwaters
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map; C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Sabyrsay uranium deposit (Ulus-Dzham steppe)
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Southern study area (Well S), south-western flank of the Kosbulak Trough
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Former Yangiabad uranium mine
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Samankul mahalla, Khojeli district
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Darsan Sayek aul, Nukus district
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Akhcha village, Chust district
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Yoshlik deposit (open pit), Almalyk ore field
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Zarafshan River at Navoi city
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Amu Darya at Sarimoy
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Amu Darya at Cholish bridge
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Amu Darya at Jumurtau
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Amu–Bukhara canal at Gijduvan bridge
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Mullala gauging station, Pskem River
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Minchukur weather station, Uradarya basin
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
1 study at this place
Pachkamar gauging station, Uradarya River
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
1 study at this place
Aktash River watershed, Karzhantau
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 12 records
Buzakhur field
Upper Jurassic
- Mineralisation
- over 300 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Na–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2022), p. 5.
Neocomian–Aptian (K1 ne+apt)
- Mineralisation
- 113.6 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Na–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2022), p. 5.
Albian–Cenomanian (K1 alb–K2 cm)
- Mineralisation
- 112.8 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Na–Ca–Mg
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2022), p. 5.
Cretaceous horizons XII and XIV
- Mineralisation
- 98.8–114.6 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca (weak brines)
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2022), p. 6–7.
Upper Jurassic
- Piezometric head
- 800–900 m
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2022), p. 6.
Buzakhur area
- Water-bearing rocks
- Lower Cretaceous
- Mineralisation
- 112.8 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 23.
Buzakhur area
- Water-bearing rocks
- Cretaceous horizons XII and XIV
- Mineralisation
- 98.8–114.6 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca (weak brines)
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2026), p. 5.
Buzakhur area
- Water-bearing rocks
- Jurassic carbonates
- Piezometric head
- 800–900 m
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2026), p. 4.
Well 5
- Depth
- 3,388.5 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XV
- Temperature
- 119 °C
- Pressure
- 37.93 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.12
- Piezometric head
- 800–900 m
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Albian–Cenomanian (XII) and Neocomian–Aptian (XIV) horizons
- Mineralisation
- 98.8–114.6 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca (Kartsev), weak brines
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 12.
Well 3
- Depth
- 3,478–3,486 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizon XVa
- Temperature
- 126 °C
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6.
Well 5
- Depth
- 3,420–3,495 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizons XVa and XV
- Temperature
- 120–121.5 °C
- Geothermal gradient
- 2.82 °C/100 m
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6, 9.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map; C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 5 records
Ilim field
Upper Jurassic
- Mineralisation
- up to 200 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Na
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2022), p. 5.
Albian–Cenomanian (K1 alb–K2 cm)
- Mineralisation
- 80 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Na–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2022), p. 5.
Upper Jurassic
- Mineralisation
- 270.1 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 5.
Upper Jurassic carbonate formation (horizons XVI–XV)
- Mineralisation
- 270.1 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 21.
Well 1
- Depth
- 3,114.5 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XV
- Pressure
- 38.17 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.22
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Kamar structure
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic
- Mineralisation
- about 100 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Na–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2022), p. 5.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
West Maimanak structure
Upper Jurassic
- Mineralisation
- 145.1 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Na–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2022), p. 6.
Neocomian–Aptian (K1 ne+apt)
- Mineralisation
- 131.2 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Na–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2022), p. 6.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 4 records
Aizavat structure
Upper Jurassic
- Mineralisation
- over 100 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Na–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2022), p. 6.
Neocomian–Aptian (K1 ne+apt)
- Mineralisation
- 206.4 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Na–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2022), p. 6.
Aizovat area
- Water-bearing rocks
- Lower Cretaceous
- Mineralisation
- 206.5 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 23.
Aizavat field, Well 1
- Depth
- 3,211 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XV
- Pressure
- 53.9 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.67
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 3 records
Alyaudy structure
Cenomanian (K2 cm)
- Mineralisation
- 46.5 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Na–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2022), p. 6.
Turonian (K2 t)
- Mineralisation
- 63.6 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Na–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2022), p. 6.
Alyaudy area
- Water-bearing rocks
- Cretaceous
- Mineralisation
- 46.4 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 22.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 4 records
Karail area
Upper Jurassic
- Piezometric head
- 1,096 m
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2022), p. 6.
Jurassic carbonates
- Piezometric head
- 1,096 m
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2026), p. 4.
Upper Jurassic
- Piezometric head
- 1,096 m
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 12.
Karail field, Well 2
- Depth
- 2,776–2,932 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizons XVa and XV
- Temperature
- 103–105.5 °C
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6, 9.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Formation water (deep wells) · 4 records
Shurasan field
Lower Cretaceous
- Mineralisation
- 100–150 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca (strong brines)
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2022), p. 3.
Shurasan structure
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation (horizons XVI–XV)
- Mineralisation
- 13.3 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 19.
Cretaceous
- Mineralisation
- 100–150 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca (strong brines)
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 22.
Shurasan area
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic
- Piezometric head
- 1,479 m
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 4, 6.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 3 records
Yakkasaray field
Lower Cretaceous
- Mineralisation
- 100–150 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca (strong brines)
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2022), p. 3.
Cretaceous
- Mineralisation
- 100–150 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca (strong brines)
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 22.
Yakkasaray area
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic
- Piezometric head
- 573 m
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 7.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
North Maimanak field
Wells 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8 and 10
- Depth
- 2,446–2,590 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Jurassic terrigenous formation, horizon XVIII
- Mineralisation
- 136.41–176.62 g/L
- Temperature
- 92–104 °C
- Water type
- Cl–Ca (Sulin), strong brines
- pH
- 6–6.7
- Boron
- 469 mg/L
- Silica (SiO₂)
- 12 mg/L
- Chloride
- 83.77–108.58 g/L
- Sulphate
- 0.477–0.303 g/L
- Piezometric head
- 390.9–508.6 m
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 3–5.
Upper Jurassic carbonate formation (horizons XVI–XV)
- Mineralisation
- 113.8 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 20.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Formation water (deep wells) · 3 records
Kultak field
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 107 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 3.
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 107 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 17.
Cretaceous
- Mineralisation
- 100–150 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca (strong brines)
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 22.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 4 records
Alan field
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 118 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 3.
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 118 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 17.
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation
- Piezometric head
- 2,747 m
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2025), p. 5.
Lower Cretaceous
- Piezometric head
- 2,747 m
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2026), p. 8.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
South Alan field
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 131 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 3.
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 131 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 17.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 4 records
Pamuk field
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 118 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 3.
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 118 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 17.
Cretaceous
- Mineralisation
- 100–150 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca (strong brines)
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 22.
Lower Cretaceous
- Piezometric head
- 431 m
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2026), p. 8.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Shimoliy Ispanly field
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 117 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 3.
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 117 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 17.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Zekry field
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 147 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 3.
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 147 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 17.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
South Kemachi field
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 107 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 3.
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 107 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 17.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Dengizkul field
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 77 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 3.
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 77 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 17.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Samantepa field
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 80 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 3.
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 80 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 17.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
South Khatar field
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 130 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 3.
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 130 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 17.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Matonat field
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 206 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 3.
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 206 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 18.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Kruk field
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 210 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 3.
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 210 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 18.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Chandyr field
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 219.5 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 3.
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 219.5 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 18.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Divalkak field
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 237 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 3.
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 237 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 18.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Farab field
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 258.8 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 3.
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 258.8 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 18.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Khodzhi field
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 199 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 3.
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 199 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 18.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Parsankul field
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 231 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 3.
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 231 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 18.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Khakkul field
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 199 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 3.
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 199 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 18.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 3 records
Kulbeshkak field
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 237 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 3.
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 237 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 18.
Cretaceous
- Mineralisation
- 227.4–230.7 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 22.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Dayakhatin field
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 205 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 3.
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 205 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 18.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
North Syuzma field
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 273 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 3.
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 273 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 18.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Uchkyr field
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 220 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 3.
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 220 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 18.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Kimerek field
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 252 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 3.
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 252 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 18.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Alachavan area
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 104.7 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 3.
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 104.7 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 18.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Bozbichkon area
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 113.6 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 3.
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 113.6 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 18.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Iymon area
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 121.8 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 3.
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 121.8 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 18.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Shimoliy Aknazar area
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 121.2 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 3.
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 121.2 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 18.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 5 records
Shurtan field
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 284 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 3.
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 284 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 18.
Well 6
- Depth
- 3,285 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XVr
- Temperature
- 120 °C
- Pressure
- 36.42 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.1
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Well 10
- Depth
- 3,097 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XVpr
- Temperature
- 112 °C
- Pressure
- 36.61 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.18
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Well 21
- Depth
- 3,103.5 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XVr
- Temperature
- 119 °C
- Pressure
- 36.47 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.17
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 3 records
Nishan field
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 330.3 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 3.
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 330.3 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 18.
Well 3
- Depth
- 3,619 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XVa
- Temperature
- 121 °C
- Pressure
- 57.37 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.55
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 3 records
Chunagar field
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 252 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 3.
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 252 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 18.
Well 9
- Depth
- 3,535 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XV
- Pressure
- 34.92 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 0.995
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 3 records
Izgancha field
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 333.5 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 3.
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 333.5 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 18.
Well 2
- Depth
- 3,716 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XV
- Pressure
- 53.45 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.435
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Umid field
Upper Jurassic (J3, horizon XV, carbonate formation)
- Mineralisation
- 201–277.3 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca (strong and very strong brines)
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 4.
Upper Jurassic carbonate formation (horizons XVI–XV)
- Mineralisation
- 201–277.3 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca (strong and very strong brines)
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 20–21.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Urtabulak field
Upper Jurassic (J3, horizon XV, carbonate formation)
- Mineralisation
- 201–277.3 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca (strong and very strong brines)
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 4.
Upper Jurassic carbonate formation (horizons XVI–XV)
- Mineralisation
- 201–277.3 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca (strong and very strong brines)
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 20–21.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Shimoliy Tegermen field
Upper Jurassic (J3, horizon XV, carbonate formation)
- Mineralisation
- 305.8 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca (very strong brine)
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 4.
Upper Jurassic carbonate formation (horizons XVI–XV)
- Mineralisation
- 305.8 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca (very strong brine)
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 21.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
South Zekry area
Upper Jurassic (J3, horizon XV, carbonate formation)
- Bromine
- 987 mg/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 4.
Upper Jurassic carbonate formation (horizons XVI–XV)
- Bromine
- 987 mg/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 21.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Darakhtli
Well 2
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic
- Mineralisation
- 255.3 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 5.
Well 2
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation (horizons XVI–XV)
- Mineralisation
- 255.3 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 22.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Girsan
Well 6
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic
- Mineralisation
- 265.2 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 5.
Well 6
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation (horizons XVI–XV)
- Mineralisation
- 265.2 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 22.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 3 records
Chilkuvar
Well 2
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic
- Mineralisation
- 285.5 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 5.
Well 2
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation (horizons XVI–XV)
- Mineralisation
- 285.5 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 22.
Chulkuvar field, Well 1
- Depth
- 3,551.5 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XVa
- Pressure
- 53.18 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.49
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 3 records
Mangit
Well 2
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic
- Mineralisation
- 296.9 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 5.
Well 2
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation (horizons XVI–XV)
- Mineralisation
- 296.9 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 22.
Mangit field, Well 2
- Depth
- 3,636 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XVa
- Temperature
- 122 °C
- Pressure
- 47.74 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.31
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Eshonkuduk
Well 1
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic
- Mineralisation
- 407.2 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2023), p. 5.
Well 1
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation (horizons XVI–XV)
- Mineralisation
- 407.2 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 22.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Karnabchul area
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 44 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 16.
Upper Jurassic carbonate formation (horizons XVI–XV)
- Mineralisation
- 42.2 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 19.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Maidadzhoy area
- Water-bearing rocks
- Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 16.2 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 16.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Karakum area
- Water-bearing rocks
- Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 135 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 17.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Khodzhikhairam area
- Water-bearing rocks
- Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 110 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 17.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Shumak area
- Water-bearing rocks
- Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 129 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 17.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Sarytash area
Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 123 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 17.
Jurassic
- Mineralisation
- 131 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 20.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Mamadzhurgaty area
- Water-bearing rocks
- Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 106 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 17.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
West Yulduzkak area
- Water-bearing rocks
- Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 118 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 17.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Tashkuduk area
- Water-bearing rocks
- Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous formation (horizons XX–XVII)
- Mineralisation
- 145 g/L
- Water type
- Cl–Ca
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 17.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Chembar area
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation (horizons XVI–XV)
- Mineralisation
- 28.7 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 19.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Azlyartepa area
Upper Jurassic carbonate formation (horizons XVI–XV)
- Mineralisation
- 32.7 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 19.
Upper Jurassic
- Piezometric head
- 436 m
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 7.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Uvada area
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation (horizons XVI–XV)
- Mineralisation
- 2.8 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 19.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
North Kuyumazar area
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation (horizons XVI–XV)
- Mineralisation
- 48 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 19.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Karim area
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation (horizons XVI–XV)
- Mineralisation
- 106.5 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 20.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Rasylkuduk area
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation (horizons XVI–XV)
- Mineralisation
- 150 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 20.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Dzharkak area
- Water-bearing rocks
- Jurassic
- Mineralisation
- 123 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 20.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Karaulbazar area
- Water-bearing rocks
- Jurassic
- Mineralisation
- 145 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 20.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 3 records
North Kamashi area
Cretaceous
- Mineralisation
- 39 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 22.
Lower Cretaceous
- Mineralisation
- 131.7 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 23.
North Kamashi field, Well 5
- Depth
- 2,218.5 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XV
- Pressure
- 23.24 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.043
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Alat field
- Water-bearing rocks
- Cretaceous
- Mineralisation
- 227.4–230.7 g/L
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2024), p. 22.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
North Urtabulak field
- Water-bearing rocks
- Lower Cretaceous
- Piezometric head
- 709 m
Values from Shoimurotov et al. (2026), p. 8.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
North Shurtan field
Well 1
- Depth
- 3,753.5 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XVpr
- Temperature
- 129 °C
- Pressure
- 39.78 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.057
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Dzhambulak field
Well 2
- Depth
- 3,670 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XVa
- Pressure
- 49.97 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.36
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Mavlyankuduk field
Well 1
- Depth
- 3,513 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XVa
- Temperature
- 123 °C
- Pressure
- 35.75 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.015
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Well 1P
- Depth
- 3,568–3,580 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizon XVa
- Temperature
- 124 °C
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map; C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Kuruksai field
Well 2
- Depth
- 3,248.5 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XV
- Temperature
- 110 °C
- Pressure
- 45.97 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.41
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Yangi Karatepa field
Well 6
- Depth
- 3,608.5 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XV
- Temperature
- 123 °C
- Pressure
- 39.38 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.088
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Well 7
- Depth
- 3,582.5 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XVa
- Temperature
- 116 °C
- Pressure
- 48.5 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.35
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Mezon field
Well 1
- Depth
- 3,287 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XV
- Pressure
- 33.87 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.027
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Guzar field
Well 1p
- Depth
- 2,914.5 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XV
- Temperature
- 111 °C
- Pressure
- 30.56 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.045
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Well 1P
- Depth
- 2,910–2,973 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizons XVa and XV
- Temperature
- 111–112.6 °C
- Geothermal gradient
- 2.22 °C/100 m
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6, 9.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map; C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
New Guzar field
Well 1
- Depth
- 3,188 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XVa
- Pressure
- 33.56 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.048
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
North Guzar field
Well 6
- Depth
- 3,077 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XV
- Pressure
- 31.37 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.016
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Karakyr field
Well 1
- Depth
- 3,529 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XV+XVa
- Temperature
- 129 °C
- Pressure
- 38.95 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.1
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Turtsari field
Well 2
- Depth
- 3,583.5 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XVpr
- Temperature
- 124 °C
- Pressure
- 35.87 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 0.998
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Feruza field
Well 1
- Depth
- 3,370.5 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XV
- Temperature
- 112 °C
- Pressure
- 48.6 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.44
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Shakarbulok field
Well 5
- Depth
- 3,845 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XVr
- Pressure
- 40.53 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.051
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Beshkent field
Well 7
- Depth
- 3,278 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XV
- Temperature
- 119 °C
- Pressure
- 57.31 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.74
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Chilgumbaz field
Well 1
- Depth
- 3,038 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XVpr
- Temperature
- 113 °C
- Pressure
- 58.31 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.92
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Khonobod field
Well 2
- Depth
- 3,186.5 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XVnr
- Temperature
- 121 °C
- Pressure
- 33.31 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.042
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
North Nishan field
Well 11
- Depth
- 3,644 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XVa
- Temperature
- 121 °C
- Pressure
- 55.7 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.53
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Kamashi field
Well 7
- Depth
- 3,392.5 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XVa
- Temperature
- 124 °C
- Pressure
- 58.9 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.73
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Mirmiron field
Well 1
- Depth
- 2,968.5 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XVpr
- Temperature
- 108 °C
- Pressure
- 30.1 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.01
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Tarmok field
Well 1
- Depth
- 3,547.5 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XVpr
- Pressure
- 37.36 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.05
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Zhilinskaya field
Well 1
- Depth
- 3,535 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XVpr
- Pressure
- 37.25 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.051
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
East Aizavat field
Well 1
- Depth
- 3,135 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XVa
- Pressure
- 45.37 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.45
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Girsan field
Well 1p
- Depth
- 3,768.5 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XVa
- Pressure
- 40.3 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.07
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Sherkent field
Well 2
- Depth
- 3,654 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XVa
- Pressure
- 47.96 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.31
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Khamal field
Well 1
- Depth
- 3,562.5 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XV
- Pressure
- 37.55 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.051
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Sarbazar field
Well 2
- Depth
- 2,935 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XVr
- Pressure
- 30.51 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.036
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Tavakkal field
Well 5
- Depth
- 3,533 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XV
- Pressure
- 26.15 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 0.73
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Chatyrtepa field
Well 1
- Depth
- 3,537 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XVa
- Pressure
- 37.87 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.067
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Well 1P
- Depth
- 3,343–3,543 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizons XVa and XV
- Temperature
- 124.5–133.5 °C
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6, 9.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map; C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Kapali field
Well 1
- Depth
- 3,203.5 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic, horizon XVa
- Pressure
- 48.24 MPa
- Pressure anomaly coefficient
- 1.51
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 3 records
Amanata field
Amanata area
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic
- Piezometric head
- 1,020 m
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 4.
Well 2
- Depth
- 1,709–1,716 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizon XVa
- Temperature
- 71.9 °C
- Geothermal gradient
- 2 °C/100 m
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6.
Well 7
- Depth
- 1,650–1,655 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizon XVa
- Temperature
- 70.8 °C
- Geothermal gradient
- 3.43 °C/100 m
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Formation water (deep wells)
West Kultak area
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic
- Piezometric head
- 3,140 m
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 4.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Karabair area
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic
- Piezometric head
- 366 m
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 7.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
North Shumak area
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic
- Piezometric head
- 310 m
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 7.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Shimoliy Darbaza area
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic
- Piezometric head
- 98 m
Values from Shoymuratov (2020), p. 7.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells) · 6 records
Adamtash field
Well 2
- Depth
- 1,641–1,716 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizon XVa
- Temperature
- 62.2 °C
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6.
Well 5
- Depth
- 1,600–1,610 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizon XVa
- Temperature
- 63 °C
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6.
Well 7
- Depth
- 1,670–1,700 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizon XVa
- Temperature
- 65 °C
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6.
Well 14
- Depth
- 1,640–1,660 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizon XVa
- Temperature
- 68.7 °C
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6.
Well 15
- Depth
- 2,160–2,204 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizons XVa and XV
- Temperature
- 74.1–75 °C
- Geothermal gradient
- 1.56 °C/100 m
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6, 9.
Well 16
- Depth
- 1,670–1,700 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizon XVa
- Temperature
- 64 °C
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Formation water (deep wells)
Auzikent field
Well 1
- Depth
- 2,040–2,053 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizon XVa
- Temperature
- 85.5 °C
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Formation water (deep wells)
East Buzakhur field
Well 3
- Depth
- 3,032–3,145 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizons XVa and XV
- Temperature
- 109–113 °C
- Geothermal gradient
- 2.64 °C/100 m
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6, 9.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Formation water (deep wells)
Dehkanabad field
Well 1
- Depth
- 3,043–3,114 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizons XVa and XV
- Temperature
- 125–128.7 °C
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6, 9.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Formation water (deep wells) · 3 records
Koshkuduk field
Well 1
- Depth
- 2,196–2,270 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizons XVa and XV
- Temperature
- 85.1–86 °C
- Geothermal gradient
- 2.74 °C/100 m
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6, 9.
Well 3
- Depth
- 2,240–2,248 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizon XVa
- Temperature
- 84 °C
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6.
Well 4
- Depth
- 2,202–2,208 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizon XVa
- Temperature
- 83 °C
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Formation water (deep wells) · 5 records
Okkul field
Well 1
- Depth
- 2,358–2,366 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizon XVa
- Temperature
- 84 °C
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6.
Well 3
- Depth
- 2,216–2,288 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizons XVa and XV
- Temperature
- 87–89 °C
- Geothermal gradient
- 2.78 °C/100 m
- Geothermal gradient
- 2.06 °C/100 m
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6, 9.
Well 7
- Depth
- 2,077–2,158 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizons XVa and XV
- Temperature
- 76–78 °C
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6, 9.
Well 5
- Depth
- 2,335–2,345 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizon XV
- Temperature
- 89 °C
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 9.
Well 6
- Depth
- 2,202–2,217 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizon XV
- Temperature
- 87 °C
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 9.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Formation water (deep wells) · 4 records
Pachkamar field
Well 3
- Depth
- 2,326–2,404 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizons XVa and XV
- Temperature
- 74–75 °C
- Geothermal gradient
- 1.79 °C/100 m
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6, 9.
Well 4
- Depth
- 2,286–2,295 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizon XVa
- Temperature
- 85 °C
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6.
Well 5
- Depth
- 2,516–2,532 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizon XVa
- Temperature
- 81 °C
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6.
Well 7
- Depth
- 2,221–2,229 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizon XVa
- Temperature
- 92.5 °C
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Shamoltegmas field
Well 1
- Depth
- 2,230–2,356 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizons XVa and XV
- Temperature
- 81–86 °C
- Geothermal gradient
- 2.42 °C/100 m
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6, 9.
Well 2
- Depth
- 2,642–2,654 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizon XVa
- Temperature
- 100 °C
- Geothermal gradient
- 1.92 °C/100 m
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Formation water (deep wells) · 3 records
South Tandyrcha field
Well 5
- Depth
- 3,501–3,573 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizons XVa and XV
- Temperature
- 125–127 °C
- Geothermal gradient
- 3.57 °C/100 m
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6, 9.
Well 10
- Depth
- 3,172–3,180 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizon XV
- Temperature
- 119 °C
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 9.
Well 11
- Depth
- 3,099–3,112 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizon XV
- Temperature
- 113 °C
- Geothermal gradient
- 2.5 °C/100 m
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 9.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Formation water (deep wells)
Akbash field
Well 1
- Depth
- 790–1,142 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizons XVa and XV
- Temperature
- 50–56 °C
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6, 9.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Formation water (deep wells)
Atar field
Well 1P
- Depth
- 2,460–2,620 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizons XVa and XV
- Temperature
- 86–90 °C
- Geothermal gradient
- 2.13 °C/100 m
- Geothermal gradient
- 2.45 °C/100 m
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6, 9.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Babasurkhan field
Well 1P
- Depth
- 738–842 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizons XVa and XV
- Temperature
- 34–36.5 °C
- Geothermal gradient
- 2.4 °C/100 m
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6, 9.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Formation water (deep wells)
Belisyainak field
Well 2
- Depth
- 3,450–3,464 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizon XVa
- Temperature
- 115 °C
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Formation water (deep wells)
Kyzylkyshlak field
Well 1
- Depth
- 2,504–2,546 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizons XVa and XV
- Temperature
- 98–100 °C
- Geothermal gradient
- 3.85 °C/100 m
- Geothermal gradient
- 1.89 °C/100 m
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6, 9.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Formation water (deep wells)
Mobik field
Well 3
- Depth
- 2,614–2,763 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizons XVa and XV
- Temperature
- 106–111 °C
- Geothermal gradient
- 3.45 °C/100 m
- Geothermal gradient
- 2.92 °C/100 m
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6, 9.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Formation water (deep wells)
Jilimchi field
Well 1P
- Depth
- 2,114–2,124 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizon XVa
- Temperature
- 81.5 °C
- Geothermal gradient
- 2.29 °C/100 m
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 6.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Formation water (deep wells) · 3 records
Jarkuduk field
Well 2
- Depth
- 2,789–2,796 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizon XV
- Temperature
- 107.5 °C
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 9.
Well 6
- Depth
- 2,956–2,965 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizon XV
- Temperature
- 101 °C
- Geothermal gradient
- 2.13 °C/100 m
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 9.
Well 7
- Depth
- 2,700–2,710 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizon XV
- Temperature
- 107.2 °C
- Geothermal gradient
- 2.89 °C/100 m
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 9.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Formation water (deep wells)
Yangi Kyzylcha field
Well 1P
- Depth
- 2,620–2,625 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizon XV
- Temperature
- 106.2 °C
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 9.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Formation water (deep wells)
Kyzylcha field
Well 1P
- Depth
- 3,296–3,306 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Upper Jurassic carbonate formation, horizon XV
- Temperature
- 108 °C
Values from Mukhammadiev (2025), p. 9.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Formation water (deep wells) · 7 records
Chimion field
Well III
- Depth
- 404–506 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Palaeogene Alai and Bukhara beds (Bukhara–Alai aquifer complex)
- Mineralisation
- 7.3–7.9 g/L
- Hydrogen sulphide
- 200 mg/L
Values from Juraev et al. (2014), p. 73, 79.
Well I (Turkestan horizon)
- Depth
- 497–543 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Palaeogene Turkestan beds (P₂trk)
- Mineralisation
- 9.6 g/L
- Hydrogen sulphide
- 75 mg/L
Values from Juraev et al. (2014), p. 79.
Well I (Bukhara–Alai complex)
- Depth
- 542–738 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Palaeogene Alai and Bukhara beds (Bukhara–Alai aquifer complex)
- Mineralisation
- 63–97 g/L
- Hydrogen sulphide
- 240 mg/L
Values from Juraev et al. (2014), p. 73, 79.
Well IV
- Depth
- 855–1,200 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Palaeogene Alai and Bukhara beds (Bukhara–Alai aquifer complex)
- Mineralisation
- 158 g/L
- Hydrogen sulphide
- 306 mg/L
Values from Juraev et al. (2014), p. 79.
Well VI (Alai beds)
- Depth
- 1,140–1,177 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Palaeogene Alai beds (P₂al)
- Mineralisation
- 101 g/L
- Hydrogen sulphide
- 126 mg/L
Values from Juraev et al. (2014), p. 79.
Well VI (Bukhara beds)
- Depth
- 1,210–1,238 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Palaeogene Bukhara beds (P₁bhr)
- Mineralisation
- 148 g/L
- Hydrogen sulphide
- 180 mg/L
Values from Juraev et al. (2014), p. 79.
Well V
- Water-bearing rocks
- Bukhara–Alai aquifer complex (Palaeogene)
- Mineralisation
- 4.7–5.1 g/L
- Hydrogen sulphide
- 230–250 mg/L
Values from Juraev et al. (2014), p. 73.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Formation water (deep wells)
Chotqol sanatorium, Gazalkent
Well No. 5-t
- Depth
- 1,400 m
- Mineralisation
- 0.8 g/L
- Temperature
- 47.2 °C
- Water type
- Cl–Na
- pH
- 7.9–8.5
Values from Aitmetova & Meylieva (2021), p. 229.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Formation water (deep wells)
Turon sanatorium
Well No. 8bis
- Depth
- 1,905 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Cenomanian aquifer complex (K₂cm)
- Mineralisation
- 1.1 g/L
- Temperature
- 46–63 °C
- Water type
- Cl–SO₄–HCO₃–Na
- pH
- 7.5
Values from Aitmetova & Meylieva (2021), p. 229.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Chinabad sanatorium
Well No. 7
- Depth
- 1,544 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Cenomanian aquifer complex (K₂cm)
- Mineralisation
- 0.8 g/L
- Temperature
- 51 °C
- Water type
- Cl–SO₄–HCO₃–Na
- pH
- 8
Values from Aitmetova & Meylieva (2021), p. 229–230.
Reserve well No. 7bis
- Depth
- 1,600 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Cenomanian aquifer complex (K₂cm)
- Mineralisation
- 1.7 g/L
- Temperature
- 48.5–52.2 °C
- Water type
- HCO₃–Cl–Na
- pH
- 7.5
Values from Aitmetova & Meylieva (2021), p. 230.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Formation water (deep wells)
Semashko clinic, Tashkent
Wells No. 1 and 2
- Depth
- well 1: 2,058 m (filters 1,687–1,776 m); well 2: 1,902 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Cenomanian aquifer complex (K₂cm)
- Mineralisation
- 0.8 g/L
- Temperature
- 47–47.5 °C
- Water type
- Cl–SO₄–HCO₃–Na
- pH
- 7.55–8.1
Values from Aitmetova & Meylieva (2021), p. 230.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Formation water (deep wells)
Tashkent
Well No. 3
- Depth
- 2,435 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Cenomanian aquifer complex (K₂cm)
- Mineralisation
- 1.1 g/L
- Temperature
- 62 °C
- Water type
- SO₄–HCO₃–Na
- pH
- 8.2
Values from Aitmetova & Meylieva (2021), p. 230.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Botanika sanatorium
Well No. 10/81bis
- Depth
- 2,305 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Cenomanian aquifer complex (K₂cm)
- Mineralisation
- 1.1 g/L
- Temperature
- 50 °C
- Water type
- SO₄–Cl–HCO₃–Na
- pH
- 7.7
Values from Aitmetova & Meylieva (2021), p. 230.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Formation water (deep wells)
Nazarbek sanatorium
Well No. 1tn
- Depth
- 1,630 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Cenomanian aquifer complex (K₂cm)
- Mineralisation
- 1 g/L
- Temperature
- 60 °C
- Water type
- HCO₃–Na
- pH
- 8.3
Values from Aitmetova & Meylieva (2021), p. 231.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Formation water (deep wells)
Zangiota Zam-Zam sanatorium
Well No. 7pr
- Depth
- 1,920 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Lower Cretaceous
- Mineralisation
- 3.6–3.8 g/L
- Temperature
- 58 °C
- Water type
- Cl–Na
- Silica (SiO₂)
- up to 70 mg/L
Values from Aitmetova & Meylieva (2021), p. 231.
Location: A: coordinates printed in the study.
Formation water (deep wells) · 2 records
Tashminvody hospital
Well No. 5/1
- Depth
- 1,371 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Cenomanian aquifer complex (K₂cm)
- Mineralisation
- 0.9 g/L
- Temperature
- 55.4 °C
- Water type
- Cl–SO₄–HCO₃–Na
- pH
- 8.2
Values from Aitmetova & Meylieva (2021), p. 231.
Well No. 6/2
- Depth
- 1,329 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Cenomanian
- Temperature
- 57 °C
Values from Aitmetova & Meylieva (2021), p. 231.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Formation water (deep wells)
Karakamysh, Tashkent
Well No. 5pr
- Depth
- 2,375 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Lower Cretaceous
- Mineralisation
- 1.3–1.7 g/L
- Temperature
- 22–24 °C
- Water type
- HCO₃–Cl–Na
- pH
- 8.2–8.3
Values from Aitmetova & Meylieva (2021), p. 231.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Formation water (deep wells)
Semurg sanatorium, Eshonguzar
Well No. 6pr
- Depth
- 1,900 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Lower Cretaceous
- Mineralisation
- 0.8 g/L
- Temperature
- 58 °C
- Silica (SiO₂)
- up to 72 mg/L
- Flow
- 2.5 L/s
Values from Aitmetova & Meylieva (2021), p. 231.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Groundwater
Akhcha village, Chust district
- Nitrate
- 15.6 mg/dm³
- Sulphate
- 254.4 mg/dm³
- Metals
- Mg 14.2; Ca 1.17; Fe 0.27 mg/dm³
Values from Mamajanov & Toshmatov (2020), p. 34.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Groundwater · 3 records
Yoshlik deposit
Fracture groundwater
- Depth
- 25–38 m to water before mining; fracturing to about 100 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- fractured Palaeozoic intrusive, volcanic and carbonate rocks
- Mineralisation
- 0.3–1.04 g/L (dry residue)
- pH
- 6.2–7.6
Values from Isomatov & Gaibnazarov (2021), p. 5–7.
Fracture–vein water, Kalmakyr fault zone
- Water-bearing rocks
- fault and fracture zones (Kalmakyr fault)
- Water type
- SO₄–Ca (rarely Na)
- Hardness
- 5.4–13.2 mg-eq/L
- Flow
- 9.3–12.5 L/s
Values from Isomatov & Gaibnazarov (2021), p. 7.
Alluvial groundwater, Almalyksay valley
- Water-bearing rocks
- Quaternary alluvial gravels of the Almalyksay
- Mineralisation
- 0.16–0.28 g/L (dry residue)
- Water type
- HCO₃–Ca
- Hardness
- 1.3–4 mg-eq/L
- Flow
- 10–32 L/s
Values from Isomatov & Gaibnazarov (2021), p. 7.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Groundwater · Spring · 2 records
Khoja-Obi-Garm
Borehole (sample 49)
- Water-bearing rocks
- fractured granite
- Temperature
- 94 °C
Values from Chelnokov et al. (2022), p. 12, 15, 20.
Springs and boreholes
- Water-bearing rocks
- crushed granite along the Khoja-Obi-Garm fault
- Mineralisation
- under 0.5 g/L (total dissolved solids)
- Temperature
- 57–93 °C
- Water type
- Na–SO₄–HCO₃
- pH
- up to 8
- Silica (SiO₂)
- about 140 mg/L
- Radon
- up to 814 Bq/L
Values from Demonova et al. (2019).
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Spring
Djelandy
Thermal spring (sample 48)
- Temperature
- 79 °C
Values from Chelnokov et al. (2022), p. 15, 19.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Spring
Garm-Chashma
Thermal spring
- Temperature
- 60 °C
Values from Chelnokov et al. (2022), p. 17.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Mine water
Sugraly uranium mines, Beshbulak depression
Mines No. 2-3 and No. 4
- Depth
- ore bodies down to 500 m; main thermal aquifer below 411 m in the Kyzylkumsky shaft (completed at the 441.5 m mark)
- Water-bearing rocks
- four interstratal confined aquifers with hot groundwater
- Temperature
- 42–53 °C
Values from Malgin (1997), p. 38–39.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Groundwater · 4 records
Nurabad
Geothermal well No. 9
- Temperature
- 38–40 °C
Values from Sanakulov & Dedov (2011), p. 16, 17.
Three thermal water wells
- Depth
- 300 m
- Temperature
- 36 °C
Values from Shemetov & Kimelfeld (2008), p. 57.
Geothermal well No. 9, Janub water intake
- Temperature
- 37–40 °C
Values from Isunts et al. (2018), p. 144.
Well 180 m deep, uranium ore field
- Depth
- 180 m
- Radon
- 247–466 Bq/L
- Note
- Six samples from this well and the other well of the study, not assigned to either well. The well supplies the settlement’s heating systems.
Values from Muzafarov et al. (2018), p. 126–127.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Groundwater
Uchkuduk
Well 250 m deep, uranium ore field
- Depth
- 250 m
- Radon
- 247–466 Bq/L
- Note
- Six samples from this well and the other well of the study, not assigned to either well.
Values from Muzafarov et al. (2018), p. 126–127.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Mine water · River and canal water · 2 records
Former Yangiabad uranium mine
Mine water (sites 1, 3 and 5)
- Gross alpha activity
- 5.17–6.02 Bq/L
- Gross beta activity
- 2.05–2.29 Bq/L
- Radium-226
- up to 0.79 Bq/L
- Thorium-232
- up to 0.67 Bq/L
Values from Zaredinov et al. (2025), p. 152.
Surface water (sites 2, 4, 6 and 7)
- Gross alpha activity
- 0.15–0.18 Bq/L
- Gross beta activity
- 0.94–1.22 Bq/L
- Radium-226
- up to 0.61 Bq/L
- Thorium-232
- up to 0.69 Bq/L
Values from Zaredinov et al. (2025), p. 152.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
River and canal water
Zarafshan River at Navoi city
- Mineralisation
- 1.2 g/L
- Sulphate
- 501.8 mg/dm³
- Chloride
- 244.6 mg/dm³
- Nitrate
- NO₃ 0.6; NO₂ <0.02 mg/dm³
- Metals
- Mn 4.98; Pb 0.13; Cu 0.02; Zn 0.05; Co 0.1; Cr 0.04; Ni 0.02 mg/dm³
- Uranium-238
- 0.76 Bq/L
- Radium-226
- 0.016 Bq/L
- Thorium-232
- 0.18 Bq/L
- Polonium-210
- 0.013 Bq/L
- Gross alpha activity
- 0.17 ± 0.07 Bq/L
- Gross beta activity
- 0.6 ± 0.3 Bq/L
Values from Juraqulov et al. (2025), p. 28–29, 29, 30.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
River and canal water
Amu Darya at Sarimoy
- Mineralisation
- 1.6 g/L
- Sulphate
- 509.3 mg/dm³
- Chloride
- 173.7 mg/dm³
- Nitrate
- NO₃ 13; NO₂ <0.02 mg/dm³
- Metals
- Mn 0.58; Pb 0.11; Cu 0.02; Zn 0.06; Co 0.07; Cr 0.03; Ni 0.07 mg/dm³
- Uranium-238
- 0.81 Bq/L
- Radium-226
- 0.019 Bq/L
- Thorium-232
- 0.26 Bq/L
- Polonium-210
- 0.016 Bq/L
- Gross alpha activity
- 0.18 ± 0.09 Bq/L
- Gross beta activity
- 0.41 ± 0.4 Bq/L
Values from Juraqulov et al. (2025), p. 28–29, 29, 30.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
River and canal water
Amu Darya at Cholish bridge
- Mineralisation
- 1.8 g/L
- Sulphate
- 600.5 mg/dm³
- Chloride
- 108.1 mg/dm³
- Metals
- Mn 0.55; Pb 0.1; Cu 0.02; Zn 0.02; Co 0.06; Cr 0.02; Ni 0.06 mg/dm³
- Uranium-238
- 0.73 Bq/L
- Radium-226
- 0.014 Bq/L
- Thorium-232
- 0.16 Bq/L
- Polonium-210
- 0.008 Bq/L
- Gross alpha activity
- 0.18 ± 0.08 Bq/L
- Gross beta activity
- 0.5 ± 0.38 Bq/L
Values from Juraqulov et al. (2025), p. 28–29, 29, 30.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
River and canal water
Amu Darya at Jumurtau
- Mineralisation
- 2.1 g/L
- Sulphate
- 637.2 mg/dm³
- Chloride
- 108.1 mg/dm³
- Metals
- Mn 1.31; Pb 0.16; Cu 0.03; Zn 0.03; Co 0.09; Cr 0.04; Ni 0.08 mg/dm³
- Uranium-238
- 0.78 Bq/L
- Radium-226
- 0.024 Bq/L
- Thorium-232
- 0.23 Bq/L
- Polonium-210
- 0.017 Bq/L
- Gross alpha activity
- 0.19 ± 0.07 Bq/L
- Gross beta activity
- 0.53 ± 0.17 Bq/L
Values from Juraqulov et al. (2025), p. 28–29, 29, 30.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
River and canal water
Amu–Bukhara canal at Gijduvan bridge
- Mineralisation
- 1.12 g/L
- Sulphate
- 511.6 mg/dm³
- Chloride
- 237.5 mg/dm³
- Nitrate
- NO₃ 1.3; NO₂ <0.02 mg/dm³
- Metals
- Mn 0.84; Pb 0.17; Cu 0.03; Zn 0.04; Co 0.12; Cr 0.04; Ni 0.07 mg/dm³
- Uranium-238
- 0.58 Bq/L
- Radium-226
- 0.032 Bq/L
- Thorium-232
- 0.37 Bq/L
- Polonium-210
- 0.052 Bq/L
- Gross alpha activity
- 0.2 ± 0.1 Bq/L
- Gross beta activity
- 0.22 ± 0.16 Bq/L
Values from Juraqulov et al. (2025), p. 28–29, 29, 30.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Groundwater
Jomboy District
Observation well 221
- Water-bearing rocks
- shallow groundwater (water table)
- Mineralisation
- 0.253–0.362 g/L
Values from Adenbaev & Baratov (2023), p. 48, 49.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Groundwater
Narpay District
Observation well 313
- Water-bearing rocks
- shallow groundwater (water table)
- Mineralisation
- 0.513–3.201 g/L
Values from Adenbaev & Baratov (2023), p. 48, 49.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Groundwater
Samankul mahalla, Khojeli district
Well, Aydar street
- Mineralisation
- 1.344 g/L (dry residue)
- Hardness
- 14.4 mg-eq/dm³
- pH
- 8
- Sulphate
- 240 mg/dm³
- Chloride
- 221 mg/dm³
- Nitrate
- 1 mg/dm³
- Metals
- Fe 0.03; Cu 0.02; Cd 0 mg/dm³
Values from Abdiramanova et al. (2025), p. 21–22.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Groundwater
Darsan Sayek aul, Nukus district
Well
- Mineralisation
- 1.728 g/L (dry residue)
- Hardness
- 19.3 mg-eq/dm³
- pH
- 8
- Sulphate
- 283 mg/dm³
- Chloride
- 378 mg/dm³
- Nitrate
- 1.8 mg/dm³
- Metals
- Cd 0 mg/dm³
Values from Abdiramanova et al. (2025), p. 21–22.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Groundwater · 2 records
Dried south-eastern Aral Sea bed
Turonian–Lower Senonian confined aquifer, wells including self-flowing well 1or
- Depth
- top of the aquifer at 380–520 m (−360 to −500 m above sea level)
- Water-bearing rocks
- Turonian–Lower Senonian fine-grained sands, less often sandstones, with clay and siltstone layers
- Mineralisation
- 1.4–1.9 g/L
- Temperature
- 38–41 °C
- Water type
- sulphate–chloride class, sodium–magnesium and calcium group, second type
- Hardness
- 2.6–6.5 mg-eq/L
- Flow
- 4–12 L/s
Values from Mavlyanov & Iztileuov (2024), p. 98–100, 103.
Shallow groundwater, New Aral marine and Upper Pliocene–Eopleistocene aquifers
- Depth
- water table 1.5–2.5 m; less than 0.5–1.0 m on the bed exposed in the last regression
- Water-bearing rocks
- Quaternary New Aral marine deposits; Upper Pliocene–Eopleistocene sands and sandstones
- Mineralisation
- 7.7–76 g/L
- Water type
- chloride and sulphate–chloride class, sodium group, second and third types
- pH
- 7.7–8.1
- Flow
- 0.1–0.8 L/s
Values from Mavlyanov & Iztileuov (2024), p. 98, 102.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Groundwater · 2 records
Koson district
Geothermal water source, sample 1
- Hardness
- 3.981 mg-eq/dm³
- pH
- 7.6
- Chloride
- 232.465 mg/dm³
Values from Toshmamatov et al. (2023), p. 75.
Geothermal water source, sample 2
- Hardness
- 3.569 mg-eq/dm³
- pH
- 7.7
- Chloride
- 234.356 mg/dm³
Values from Toshmamatov et al. (2023), p. 75.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Groundwater
Muborak district
Geothermal water source
- Hardness
- 3.839 mg-eq/dm³
- pH
- 7.7
- Chloride
- 235.436 mg/dm³
Values from Toshmamatov et al. (2023), p. 75.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Groundwater
Angor
Well 8 m deep
- Depth
- 8 m
- Temperature
- 20 °C
Values from Choriev (2023), p. 130.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Formation water (deep wells)
Jayronkhona sanatorium
Well IX
- Water-bearing rocks
- Palaeogene (Alay) limestone and shell rock (Pg2 al)
- Mineralisation
- 26.9–28.6 g/L
- Temperature
- 37–40 °C
- Water type
- Cl–Na, hydrogen-sulphide, iodine–bromine
- Hydrogen sulphide
- 250–600 mg/L
- Iodine
- 23.7 mg/L
- Bromine
- 53.5 mg/L
- pH
- 6.2–6.6
Values from Mumindzhanov et al. (2025), p. 66.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Groundwater · Formation water (deep wells) · 3 records
Uchkizil sanatorium
Well XII
- Water-bearing rocks
- Senonian sandstone (K2 sn)
- Mineralisation
- 60–65.4 g/L
- Temperature
- 40 °C
- Water type
- Cl–Na, hydrogen-sulphide
- Hydrogen sulphide
- 340–400 mg/L
- pH
- 8.1
Values from Mumindzhanov et al. (2025), p. 66.
Marvarid sanatorium, Well XII
- Water-bearing rocks
- Senonian sandstone (K2 sn)
- Mineralisation
- 28.01 g/L
- Temperature
- 21–24 °C
- Water type
- SO₄–Cl–Na, hydrogen-sulphide
- Hydrogen sulphide
- 350–400 mg/L
- pH
- 6.3
Values from Mumindzhanov et al. (2025), p. 66.
Termiz Marvaridi sanatorium, Well XII
- Water-bearing rocks
- Senonian sandstone (K2 sn)
- Mineralisation
- 26.04 g/L
- Temperature
- 21–24 °C
- Water type
- SO₄–Cl–Na, hydrogen-sulphide
- Hydrogen sulphide
- 350–400 mg/L
- pH
- 4.8
Values from Mumindzhanov et al. (2025), p. 66.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map; C: district or small area, approximate.
Spring
Omonkhona spring
- Water-bearing rocks
- Senonian (K2 sn)
- Mineralisation
- 2.4–2.5 g/L
- Temperature
- 17–18 °C
- Water type
- SO₄–Mg–Na, nitrogen
- pH
- 7.2
Values from Mumindzhanov et al. (2025), p. 66.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Spring
Khojaipok spring
- Water-bearing rocks
- Senonian sandstone (K2 sn)
- Mineralisation
- 1.7–2.5 g/L
- Temperature
- 20–21.3 °C
- Water type
- SO₄–Ca
- pH
- 6.4
Values from Mumindzhanov et al. (2025), p. 66.
Location: B: named well, field, spring or settlement, placed from a map.
Groundwater · 2 records
Altynsai field
Groundwater
- Mineralisation
- 1.2–1.4 g/L
- Temperature
- 62–65 °C
- Water type
- nitrogen–alkaline thermal water
- pH
- 7.5–7.7
Values from Ismailov et al. (2024), p. 90.
Wells 1-re, 2-re, 1-r, 2-r, 2-p and 5-p
- Depth
- 135–300 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Palaeozoic deposits
- Mineralisation
- 1.6–1.9 g/L
- Temperature
- 68–70 °C
Values from Ismailov et al. (2024), p. 3.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Groundwater
Chimbay
Well 4-r
- Depth
- 657–675 m
- Water-bearing rocks
- Albian
- Water type
- iron–bromine water
- Flow
- about 500 m³/day
Values from Ismailov et al. (2024), p. 89.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Groundwater
Sarmich deposit, Nurata mountains
- Water-bearing rocks
- Palaeozoic
- Water type
- arsenic water
- Metals
- As 0.8 mg/L
Values from Ismailov et al. (2024), p. 90.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Groundwater
Charmitan deposit
- Water-bearing rocks
- Palaeozoic
- Water type
- arsenic water
- Metals
- As 0.8 mg/L
Values from Ismailov et al. (2024), p. 91.
Location: C: district or small area, approximate.
Source: Geolex, the English edition of Abduazimova (Ed.), 2001, Stratigraphic Dictionary of Uzbekistan. Each name links to its Geolex entry.